Barbados vs Uruguay: Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square

Barbados
0.0067 kt per square kilometre
in 2023
Uruguay
0.0073 kt per square kilometre
in 2023
Barbados rank
26th
Uruguay rank
23rd

Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square over time

  • Barbados
  • Uruguay
00.010.020.03196119922023

How they compare

Uruguay currently reports 0.0073 kt per square kilometre against 0.0067 kt per square kilometre in Barbados, a difference of 0.0006 kt per square kilometre.

That makes Uruguay's figure about 1.1 times Barbados's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Uruguay ahead.

Barbados ranks 26th and Uruguay ranks 23rd of 159 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Barbados averaged higher in 1 and Uruguay in 6.

Head to head by decade

Decade Barbados Uruguay Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0199 kt per square kilometre 0.027 kt per square kilometre 0.0071 kt per square kilometre Uruguay
1970s 0.0237 kt per square kilometre 0.0201 kt per square kilometre 0.0036 kt per square kilometre Barbados
1980s 0.0219 kt per square kilometre 0.027 kt per square kilometre 0.0051 kt per square kilometre Uruguay
1990s 0.0034 kt per square kilometre 0.0259 kt per square kilometre 0.0225 kt per square kilometre Uruguay
2000s 0.0048 kt per square kilometre 0.0131 kt per square kilometre 0.0082 kt per square kilometre Uruguay
2010s 0.0064 kt per square kilometre 0.0088 kt per square kilometre 0.0024 kt per square kilometre Uruguay
2020s 0.0067 kt per square kilometre 0.0076 kt per square kilometre 0.0008 kt per square kilometre Uruguay

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), per square, Barbados or Uruguay?
Uruguay, at 0.0073 kt per square kilometre against 0.0067 kt per square kilometre in Barbados as of 2023.
What is the difference in meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), per square between Barbados and Uruguay?
0.0006 kt per square kilometre, with Uruguay ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Barbados and Uruguay?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Barbados and Uruguay rank globally for meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), per square?
Barbados ranks 26th and Uruguay ranks 23rd of 159 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Barbados vs Uruguay: Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 26 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-sheep-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-co2eq-ar5-per-square-kilometre/barbados/uruguay/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-sheep-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-co2eq-ar5-per-square-kilometre/barbados/uruguay/">Barbados vs Uruguay: Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre
Unit
kt per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
160 places, 9,116 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.