Belgium vs Cameroon: Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square

Belgium
0.0012 kt per square kilometre
in 2022
Cameroon
0.0012 kt per square kilometre
in 2023
Belgium rank
93rd
Cameroon rank
92nd

Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square over time

  • Belgium
  • Cameroon
0.0010.0010.0010.0010.0020.002196119922023

How they compare

Cameroon currently reports 0.0012 kt per square kilometre against 0.0012 kt per square kilometre in Belgium, a difference of 0 kt per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 20 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Belgium ahead.

Belgium ranks 93rd and Cameroon ranks 92nd of 159 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Belgium averaged higher in 2 and Cameroon in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Belgium Cameroon Difference Ahead
2000s 0.0015 kt per square kilometre 0.0013 kt per square kilometre 0.0002 kt per square kilometre Belgium
2010s 0.0012 kt per square kilometre 0.0011 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Belgium
2020s 0.0012 kt per square kilometre 0.0012 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Cameroon

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), per square, Belgium or Cameroon?
Cameroon, at 0.0012 kt per square kilometre against 0.0012 kt per square kilometre in Belgium as of 2023.
What is the difference in meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), per square between Belgium and Cameroon?
0 kt per square kilometre, with Cameroon ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Belgium and Cameroon?
20 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2022.
How do Belgium and Cameroon rank globally for meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), per square?
Belgium ranks 93rd and Cameroon ranks 92nd of 159 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Belgium vs Cameroon: Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 26 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-sheep-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-co2eq-ar5-per-square-kilometre/belgium/cameroon/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-sheep-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-co2eq-ar5-per-square-kilometre/belgium/cameroon/">Belgium vs Cameroon: Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre
Unit
kt per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
160 places, 9,116 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.