Belgium vs Guatemala: Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square

Belgium
0.0012 kt per square kilometre
in 2022
Guatemala
0.0012 kt per square kilometre
in 2023
Belgium rank
93rd
Guatemala rank
90th

Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square over time

  • Belgium
  • Guatemala
0.0010.0010.0010.0010.0020.002196119922023

How they compare

Guatemala currently reports 0.0012 kt per square kilometre against 0.0012 kt per square kilometre in Belgium, a difference of 0 kt per square kilometre.

That makes Guatemala's figure about 1.1 times Belgium's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 20 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Belgium ahead.

Belgium ranks 93rd and Guatemala ranks 90th of 159 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Belgium averaged higher in 1 and Guatemala in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Belgium Guatemala Difference Ahead
2000s 0.0015 kt per square kilometre 0.001 kt per square kilometre 0.0006 kt per square kilometre Belgium
2010s 0.0012 kt per square kilometre 0.0012 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Guatemala
2020s 0.0012 kt per square kilometre 0.0012 kt per square kilometre 0.0001 kt per square kilometre Guatemala

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), per square, Belgium or Guatemala?
Guatemala, at 0.0012 kt per square kilometre against 0.0012 kt per square kilometre in Belgium as of 2023.
What is the difference in meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), per square between Belgium and Guatemala?
0 kt per square kilometre, with Guatemala ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Belgium and Guatemala?
20 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2022.
How do Belgium and Guatemala rank globally for meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), per square?
Belgium ranks 93rd and Guatemala ranks 90th of 159 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Belgium vs Guatemala: Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 27 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-sheep-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-co2eq-ar5-per-square-kilometre/belgium/guatemala/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-sheep-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-co2eq-ar5-per-square-kilometre/belgium/guatemala/">Belgium vs Guatemala: Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre
Unit
kt per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
160 places, 9,116 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.