Comoros vs Cuba: Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square

Comoros
0.003 kt per square kilometre
in 2023
Cuba
0.0029 kt per square kilometre
in 2023
Comoros rank
59th
Cuba rank
60th

Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square over time

  • Comoros
  • Cuba
00.0020.0040.0060.008196119922023

How they compare

Comoros currently reports 0.003 kt per square kilometre against 0.0029 kt per square kilometre in Cuba, a difference of 0.0001 kt per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Cuba ahead.

Comoros ranks 59th and Cuba ranks 60th of 159 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Comoros averaged higher in 4 and Cuba in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Comoros Cuba Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0006 kt per square kilometre 0.0005 kt per square kilometre 0.0001 kt per square kilometre Comoros
1970s 0.0009 kt per square kilometre 0.0006 kt per square kilometre 0.0002 kt per square kilometre Comoros
1980s 0.0014 kt per square kilometre 0.0013 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Comoros
1990s 0.0021 kt per square kilometre 0.0052 kt per square kilometre 0.003 kt per square kilometre Cuba
2000s 0.0026 kt per square kilometre 0.0052 kt per square kilometre 0.0026 kt per square kilometre Cuba
2010s 0.0028 kt per square kilometre 0.0038 kt per square kilometre 0.001 kt per square kilometre Cuba
2020s 0.003 kt per square kilometre 0.003 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Comoros

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), per square, Comoros or Cuba?
Comoros, at 0.003 kt per square kilometre against 0.0029 kt per square kilometre in Cuba as of 2023.
What is the difference in meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), per square between Comoros and Cuba?
0.0001 kt per square kilometre, with Comoros ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Comoros and Cuba?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Comoros and Cuba rank globally for meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), per square?
Comoros ranks 59th and Cuba ranks 60th of 159 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Comoros vs Cuba: Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 27 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-sheep-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-co2eq-ar5-per-square-kilometre/comoros/cuba/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-sheep-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-co2eq-ar5-per-square-kilometre/comoros/cuba/">Comoros vs Cuba: Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre
Unit
kt per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
160 places, 9,116 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.