Congo vs Malaysia: Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square

Congo
0.0001 kt per square kilometre
in 2023
Malaysia
0.0001 kt per square kilometre
in 2023
Congo rank
142nd
Malaysia rank
140th

Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square over time

  • Congo
  • Malaysia
0000196119922023

How they compare

Malaysia currently reports 0.0001 kt per square kilometre against 0.0001 kt per square kilometre in Congo, a difference of 0 kt per square kilometre.

That makes Malaysia's figure about 1.2 times Congo's.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Malaysia ahead.

Congo ranks 142nd and Malaysia ranks 140th of 159 countries.

Malaysia has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Congo Malaysia Difference Ahead
1960s 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Malaysia
1970s 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Malaysia
1980s 0.0001 kt per square kilometre 0.0001 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Malaysia
1990s 0.0001 kt per square kilometre 0.0001 kt per square kilometre 0.0001 kt per square kilometre Malaysia
2000s 0.0001 kt per square kilometre 0.0001 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Malaysia
2010s 0.0001 kt per square kilometre 0.0001 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Malaysia
2020s 0.0001 kt per square kilometre 0.0001 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Malaysia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), per square, Congo or Malaysia?
Malaysia, at 0.0001 kt per square kilometre against 0.0001 kt per square kilometre in Congo as of 2023.
What is the difference in meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), per square between Congo and Malaysia?
0 kt per square kilometre, with Malaysia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Malaysia?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Congo and Malaysia rank globally for meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), per square?
Congo ranks 142nd and Malaysia ranks 140th of 159 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Congo vs Malaysia: Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 26 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-sheep-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-co2eq-ar5-per-square-kilometre/congo-rep/malaysia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-sheep-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-co2eq-ar5-per-square-kilometre/congo-rep/malaysia/">Congo vs Malaysia: Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre
Unit
kt per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
160 places, 9,116 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.