Cuba vs South Sudan: Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square

Cuba
0.0029 kt per square kilometre
in 2023
South Sudan
0.0028 kt per square kilometre
in 2023
Cuba rank
60th
South Sudan rank
62nd

Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square over time

  • Cuba
  • South Sudan
00.0020.0040.0060.008196119922023

How they compare

Cuba currently reports 0.0029 kt per square kilometre against 0.0028 kt per square kilometre in South Sudan, a difference of 0.0001 kt per square kilometre.

Across all 12 years both countries report, Cuba has been ahead every year.

Cuba ranks 60th and South Sudan ranks 62nd of 159 countries.

Cuba has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Cuba South Sudan Difference Ahead
2010s 0.0037 kt per square kilometre 0.0031 kt per square kilometre 0.0006 kt per square kilometre Cuba
2020s 0.003 kt per square kilometre 0.0028 kt per square kilometre 0.0001 kt per square kilometre Cuba

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), per square, Cuba or South Sudan?
Cuba, at 0.0029 kt per square kilometre against 0.0028 kt per square kilometre in South Sudan as of 2023.
What is the difference in meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), per square between Cuba and South Sudan?
0.0001 kt per square kilometre, with Cuba ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cuba and South Sudan?
12 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2023.
How do Cuba and South Sudan rank globally for meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), per square?
Cuba ranks 60th and South Sudan ranks 62nd of 159 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Cuba vs South Sudan: Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 27 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-sheep-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-co2eq-ar5-per-square-kilometre/cuba/south-sudan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-sheep-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-co2eq-ar5-per-square-kilometre/cuba/south-sudan/">Cuba vs South Sudan: Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre
Unit
kt per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
160 places, 9,116 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.