Ecuador vs Latvia: Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square

Ecuador
0.0004 kt per square kilometre
in 2023
Latvia
0.0004 kt per square kilometre
in 2023
Ecuador rank
118th
Latvia rank
116th

Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square over time

  • Ecuador
  • Latvia
00.0010.0010.002196119922023

How they compare

Latvia currently reports 0.0004 kt per square kilometre against 0.0004 kt per square kilometre in Ecuador, a difference of 0 kt per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Ecuador ahead.

Ecuador ranks 118th and Latvia ranks 116th of 159 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Ecuador averaged higher in 2 and Latvia in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Ecuador Latvia Difference Ahead
1990s 0.0013 kt per square kilometre 0.0005 kt per square kilometre 0.0008 kt per square kilometre Ecuador
2000s 0.0007 kt per square kilometre 0.0002 kt per square kilometre 0.0005 kt per square kilometre Ecuador
2010s 0.0004 kt per square kilometre 0.0005 kt per square kilometre 0.0001 kt per square kilometre Latvia
2020s 0.0004 kt per square kilometre 0.0005 kt per square kilometre 0.0001 kt per square kilometre Latvia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), per square, Ecuador or Latvia?
Latvia, at 0.0004 kt per square kilometre against 0.0004 kt per square kilometre in Ecuador as of 2023.
What is the difference in meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), per square between Ecuador and Latvia?
0 kt per square kilometre, with Latvia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Latvia?
32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
How do Ecuador and Latvia rank globally for meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), per square?
Ecuador ranks 118th and Latvia ranks 116th of 159 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Ecuador vs Latvia: Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 26 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-sheep-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-co2eq-ar5-per-square-kilometre/ecuador/latvia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-sheep-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-co2eq-ar5-per-square-kilometre/ecuador/latvia/">Ecuador vs Latvia: Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre
Unit
kt per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
160 places, 9,116 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.