Equatorial Guinea vs Sweden: Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square
Equatorial Guinea
0.0003 kt per square kilometre
in 2023
Sweden
0.0003 kt per square kilometre
in 2023
Equatorial Guinea rank
122nd
Sweden rank
125th
Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square over time
- Equatorial Guinea
- Sweden
How they compare
Equatorial Guinea currently reports 0.0003 kt per square kilometre against 0.0003 kt per square kilometre in Sweden, a difference of 0 kt per square kilometre.
That makes Equatorial Guinea's figure about 1.2 times Sweden's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Equatorial Guinea ahead.
Equatorial Guinea ranks 122nd and Sweden ranks 125th of 159 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Equatorial Guinea averaged higher in 2 and Sweden in 5.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Equatorial Guinea | Sweden | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0.0002 kt per square kilometre | 0.0002 kt per square kilometre | 0 kt per square kilometre | Equatorial Guinea |
| 1970s | 0.0002 kt per square kilometre | 0.0003 kt per square kilometre | 0 kt per square kilometre | Sweden |
| 1980s | 0.0003 kt per square kilometre | 0.0003 kt per square kilometre | 0.0001 kt per square kilometre | Sweden |
| 1990s | 0.0003 kt per square kilometre | 0.0004 kt per square kilometre | 0.0001 kt per square kilometre | Sweden |
| 2000s | 0.0003 kt per square kilometre | 0.0004 kt per square kilometre | 0.0001 kt per square kilometre | Sweden |
| 2010s | 0.0003 kt per square kilometre | 0.0005 kt per square kilometre | 0.0001 kt per square kilometre | Sweden |
| 2020s | 0.0003 kt per square kilometre | 0.0003 kt per square kilometre | 0 kt per square kilometre | Equatorial Guinea |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), per square, Equatorial Guinea or Sweden?
- Equatorial Guinea, at 0.0003 kt per square kilometre against 0.0003 kt per square kilometre in Sweden as of 2023.
- What is the difference in meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), per square between Equatorial Guinea and Sweden?
- 0 kt per square kilometre, with Equatorial Guinea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Equatorial Guinea and Sweden?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Equatorial Guinea and Sweden rank globally for meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), per square?
- Equatorial Guinea ranks 122nd and Sweden ranks 125th of 159 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.