Guatemala vs Kazakhstan: Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square

Guatemala
0.0012 kt per square kilometre
in 2023
Kazakhstan
0.0014 kt per square kilometre
in 2023
Guatemala rank
90th
Kazakhstan rank
89th

Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square over time

  • Guatemala
  • Kazakhstan
0.0010.0010.0020.0020.003196119922023

How they compare

Kazakhstan currently reports 0.0014 kt per square kilometre against 0.0012 kt per square kilometre in Guatemala, a difference of 0.0002 kt per square kilometre.

That makes Kazakhstan's figure about 1.1 times Guatemala's.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Kazakhstan ahead.

Guatemala ranks 90th and Kazakhstan ranks 89th of 159 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Guatemala averaged higher in 1 and Kazakhstan in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Guatemala Kazakhstan Difference Ahead
1990s 0.0009 kt per square kilometre 0.0018 kt per square kilometre 0.0008 kt per square kilometre Kazakhstan
2000s 0.001 kt per square kilometre 0.0009 kt per square kilometre 0.0001 kt per square kilometre Guatemala
2010s 0.0012 kt per square kilometre 0.0013 kt per square kilometre 0.0001 kt per square kilometre Kazakhstan
2020s 0.0012 kt per square kilometre 0.0014 kt per square kilometre 0.0001 kt per square kilometre Kazakhstan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), per square, Guatemala or Kazakhstan?
Kazakhstan, at 0.0014 kt per square kilometre against 0.0012 kt per square kilometre in Guatemala as of 2023.
What is the difference in meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), per square between Guatemala and Kazakhstan?
0.0002 kt per square kilometre, with Kazakhstan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Guatemala and Kazakhstan?
32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
How do Guatemala and Kazakhstan rank globally for meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), per square?
Guatemala ranks 90th and Kazakhstan ranks 89th of 159 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Guatemala vs Kazakhstan: Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 27 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-sheep-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-co2eq-ar5-per-square-kilometre/guatemala/kazakhstan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-sheep-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-co2eq-ar5-per-square-kilometre/guatemala/kazakhstan/">Guatemala vs Kazakhstan: Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre
Unit
kt per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
160 places, 9,116 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.