Malta vs Saudi Arabia: Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square

Malta
0.0017 kt per square kilometre
in 2023
Saudi Arabia
0.0016 kt per square kilometre
in 2023
Malta rank
84th
Saudi Arabia rank
85th

Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square over time

  • Malta
  • Saudi Arabia
00.0050.010.015196119922023

How they compare

Malta currently reports 0.0017 kt per square kilometre against 0.0016 kt per square kilometre in Saudi Arabia, a difference of 0.0001 kt per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Malta ahead.

Malta ranks 84th and Saudi Arabia ranks 85th of 159 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Malta averaged higher in 6 and Saudi Arabia in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Malta Saudi Arabia Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0027 kt per square kilometre 0.0001 kt per square kilometre 0.0027 kt per square kilometre Malta
1970s 0.0017 kt per square kilometre 0.0001 kt per square kilometre 0.0016 kt per square kilometre Malta
1980s 0.0017 kt per square kilometre 0.0004 kt per square kilometre 0.0013 kt per square kilometre Malta
1990s 0.0067 kt per square kilometre 0.0005 kt per square kilometre 0.0062 kt per square kilometre Malta
2000s 0.0044 kt per square kilometre 0.0005 kt per square kilometre 0.0039 kt per square kilometre Malta
2010s 0.0032 kt per square kilometre 0.0007 kt per square kilometre 0.0025 kt per square kilometre Malta
2020s 0.0016 kt per square kilometre 0.0016 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Saudi Arabia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), per square, Malta or Saudi Arabia?
Malta, at 0.0017 kt per square kilometre against 0.0016 kt per square kilometre in Saudi Arabia as of 2023.
What is the difference in meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), per square between Malta and Saudi Arabia?
0.0001 kt per square kilometre, with Malta ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Malta and Saudi Arabia?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Malta and Saudi Arabia rank globally for meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), per square?
Malta ranks 84th and Saudi Arabia ranks 85th of 159 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Malta vs Saudi Arabia: Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 27 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-sheep-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-co2eq-ar5-per-square-kilometre/malta/saudi-arabia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-sheep-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-co2eq-ar5-per-square-kilometre/malta/saudi-arabia/">Malta vs Saudi Arabia: Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre
Unit
kt per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
160 places, 9,116 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.