Mexico vs Sao Tome and Principe: Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square

Mexico
0.001 kt per square kilometre
in 2023
Sao Tome and Principe
0.0008 kt per square kilometre
in 2023
Mexico rank
102nd
Sao Tome and Principe rank
104th

Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square over time

  • Mexico
  • Sao Tome and Principe
000.0010.0010.001196119922023

How they compare

Mexico currently reports 0.001 kt per square kilometre against 0.0008 kt per square kilometre in Sao Tome and Principe, a difference of 0.0002 kt per square kilometre.

That makes Mexico's figure about 1.3 times Sao Tome and Principe's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Sao Tome and Principe ahead.

Mexico ranks 102nd and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 104th of 159 countries.

Mexico has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Mexico Sao Tome and Principe Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0007 kt per square kilometre 0.0006 kt per square kilometre 0.0001 kt per square kilometre Mexico
1970s 0.0007 kt per square kilometre 0.0003 kt per square kilometre 0.0004 kt per square kilometre Mexico
1980s 0.0007 kt per square kilometre 0.0004 kt per square kilometre 0.0003 kt per square kilometre Mexico
1990s 0.0007 kt per square kilometre 0.0005 kt per square kilometre 0.0002 kt per square kilometre Mexico
2000s 0.0008 kt per square kilometre 0.0006 kt per square kilometre 0.0001 kt per square kilometre Mexico
2010s 0.0009 kt per square kilometre 0.0007 kt per square kilometre 0.0002 kt per square kilometre Mexico
2020s 0.001 kt per square kilometre 0.0008 kt per square kilometre 0.0002 kt per square kilometre Mexico

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), per square, Mexico or Sao Tome and Principe?
Mexico, at 0.001 kt per square kilometre against 0.0008 kt per square kilometre in Sao Tome and Principe as of 2023.
What is the difference in meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), per square between Mexico and Sao Tome and Principe?
0.0002 kt per square kilometre, with Mexico ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Mexico and Sao Tome and Principe?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Mexico and Sao Tome and Principe rank globally for meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), per square?
Mexico ranks 102nd and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 104th of 159 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Mexico vs Sao Tome and Principe: Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 26 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-sheep-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-co2eq-ar5-per-square-kilometre/mexico/sao-tome-and-principe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-sheep-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-co2eq-ar5-per-square-kilometre/mexico/sao-tome-and-principe/">Mexico vs Sao Tome and Principe: Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre
Unit
kt per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
160 places, 9,116 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.