Portugal vs Turkmenistan: Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square

Portugal
0.007 kt per square kilometre
in 2023
Turkmenistan
0.0066 kt per square kilometre
in 2023
Portugal rank
25th
Turkmenistan rank
27th

Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square over time

  • Portugal
  • Turkmenistan
00.0050.010.0150.02196119922023

How they compare

Portugal currently reports 0.007 kt per square kilometre against 0.0066 kt per square kilometre in Turkmenistan, a difference of 0.0004 kt per square kilometre.

That makes Portugal's figure about 1.1 times Turkmenistan's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Portugal ahead.

Portugal ranks 25th and Turkmenistan ranks 27th of 159 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Portugal averaged higher in 3 and Turkmenistan in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Portugal Turkmenistan Difference Ahead
1990s 0.0102 kt per square kilometre 0.0028 kt per square kilometre 0.0074 kt per square kilometre Portugal
2000s 0.0083 kt per square kilometre 0.0056 kt per square kilometre 0.0027 kt per square kilometre Portugal
2010s 0.0064 kt per square kilometre 0.0065 kt per square kilometre 0.0001 kt per square kilometre Turkmenistan
2020s 0.0072 kt per square kilometre 0.0066 kt per square kilometre 0.0006 kt per square kilometre Portugal

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), per square, Portugal or Turkmenistan?
Portugal, at 0.007 kt per square kilometre against 0.0066 kt per square kilometre in Turkmenistan as of 2023.
What is the difference in meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), per square between Portugal and Turkmenistan?
0.0004 kt per square kilometre, with Portugal ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Portugal and Turkmenistan?
32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
How do Portugal and Turkmenistan rank globally for meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), per square?
Portugal ranks 25th and Turkmenistan ranks 27th of 159 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Portugal vs Turkmenistan: Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 27 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-sheep-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-co2eq-ar5-per-square-kilometre/portugal/turkmenistan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-sheep-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-co2eq-ar5-per-square-kilometre/portugal/turkmenistan/">Portugal vs Turkmenistan: Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre
Unit
kt per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
160 places, 9,116 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.