Qatar vs Saint Kitts and Nevis: Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square

Qatar
0.011 kt per square kilometre
in 2023
Saint Kitts and Nevis
0.0109 kt per square kilometre
in 2023
Qatar rank
7th
Saint Kitts and Nevis rank
8th

Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square over time

  • Qatar
  • Saint Kitts and Nevis
00.0050.010.015196119922023

How they compare

Qatar currently reports 0.011 kt per square kilometre against 0.0109 kt per square kilometre in Saint Kitts and Nevis, a difference of 0.0001 kt per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Saint Kitts and Nevis ahead.

Qatar ranks 7th and Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 8th of 159 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Qatar averaged higher in 2 and Saint Kitts and Nevis in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade Qatar Saint Kitts and Nevis Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0002 kt per square kilometre 0.0084 kt per square kilometre 0.0082 kt per square kilometre Saint Kitts and Nevis
1970s 0.0003 kt per square kilometre 0.0085 kt per square kilometre 0.0082 kt per square kilometre Saint Kitts and Nevis
1980s 0.0009 kt per square kilometre 0.0118 kt per square kilometre 0.011 kt per square kilometre Saint Kitts and Nevis
1990s 0.0021 kt per square kilometre 0.0102 kt per square kilometre 0.008 kt per square kilometre Saint Kitts and Nevis
2000s 0.0018 kt per square kilometre 0.009 kt per square kilometre 0.0072 kt per square kilometre Saint Kitts and Nevis
2010s 0.0082 kt per square kilometre 0.0055 kt per square kilometre 0.0027 kt per square kilometre Qatar
2020s 0.0122 kt per square kilometre 0.009 kt per square kilometre 0.0032 kt per square kilometre Qatar

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), per square, Qatar or Saint Kitts and Nevis?
Qatar, at 0.011 kt per square kilometre against 0.0109 kt per square kilometre in Saint Kitts and Nevis as of 2023.
What is the difference in meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), per square between Qatar and Saint Kitts and Nevis?
0.0001 kt per square kilometre, with Qatar ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Qatar and Saint Kitts and Nevis?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Qatar and Saint Kitts and Nevis rank globally for meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), per square?
Qatar ranks 7th and Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 8th of 159 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Qatar vs Saint Kitts and Nevis: Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 27 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-sheep-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-co2eq-ar5-per-square-kilometre/qatar/st-kitts-and-nevis/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-sheep-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-co2eq-ar5-per-square-kilometre/qatar/st-kitts-and-nevis/">Qatar vs Saint Kitts and Nevis: Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre
Unit
kt per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
160 places, 9,116 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.