Serbia vs Turkmenistan: Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square

Serbia
0.0063 kt per square kilometre
in 2023
Turkmenistan
0.0066 kt per square kilometre
in 2023
Serbia rank
29th
Turkmenistan rank
27th

Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square over time

  • Serbia
  • Turkmenistan
00.0020.0040.0060.008199220072023

How they compare

Turkmenistan currently reports 0.0066 kt per square kilometre against 0.0063 kt per square kilometre in Serbia, a difference of 0.0003 kt per square kilometre.

Across all 18 years both countries report, Turkmenistan has been ahead every year.

Serbia ranks 29th and Turkmenistan ranks 27th of 159 countries.

Turkmenistan has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Serbia Turkmenistan Difference Ahead
2000s 0.0049 kt per square kilometre 0.0066 kt per square kilometre 0.0017 kt per square kilometre Turkmenistan
2010s 0.0054 kt per square kilometre 0.0065 kt per square kilometre 0.0011 kt per square kilometre Turkmenistan
2020s 0.0063 kt per square kilometre 0.0066 kt per square kilometre 0.0003 kt per square kilometre Turkmenistan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), per square, Serbia or Turkmenistan?
Turkmenistan, at 0.0066 kt per square kilometre against 0.0063 kt per square kilometre in Serbia as of 2023.
What is the difference in meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), per square between Serbia and Turkmenistan?
0.0003 kt per square kilometre, with Turkmenistan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Serbia and Turkmenistan?
18 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2023.
How do Serbia and Turkmenistan rank globally for meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), per square?
Serbia ranks 29th and Turkmenistan ranks 27th of 159 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Serbia vs Turkmenistan: Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 26 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-sheep-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-co2eq-ar5-per-square-kilometre/serbia/turkmenistan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-sheep-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-co2eq-ar5-per-square-kilometre/serbia/turkmenistan/">Serbia vs Turkmenistan: Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre
Unit
kt per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
160 places, 9,116 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.