Sweden vs Zimbabwe: Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square

Sweden
0.0003 kt per square kilometre
in 2023
Zimbabwe
0.0003 kt per square kilometre
in 2023
Sweden rank
125th
Zimbabwe rank
124th

Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square over time

  • Sweden
  • Zimbabwe
00000.001196119922023

How they compare

Zimbabwe currently reports 0.0003 kt per square kilometre against 0.0003 kt per square kilometre in Sweden, a difference of 0 kt per square kilometre.

That makes Zimbabwe's figure about 1.1 times Sweden's.

The two have swapped places 8 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Zimbabwe ahead.

Sweden ranks 125th and Zimbabwe ranks 124th of 159 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Sweden averaged higher in 5 and Zimbabwe in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Sweden Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0002 kt per square kilometre 0.0003 kt per square kilometre 0.0001 kt per square kilometre Zimbabwe
1970s 0.0003 kt per square kilometre 0.0004 kt per square kilometre 0.0001 kt per square kilometre Zimbabwe
1980s 0.0003 kt per square kilometre 0.0003 kt per square kilometre 0.0001 kt per square kilometre Sweden
1990s 0.0004 kt per square kilometre 0.0003 kt per square kilometre 0.0001 kt per square kilometre Sweden
2000s 0.0004 kt per square kilometre 0.0003 kt per square kilometre 0.0001 kt per square kilometre Sweden
2010s 0.0005 kt per square kilometre 0.0002 kt per square kilometre 0.0003 kt per square kilometre Sweden
2020s 0.0003 kt per square kilometre 0.0002 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Sweden

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), per square, Sweden or Zimbabwe?
Zimbabwe, at 0.0003 kt per square kilometre against 0.0003 kt per square kilometre in Sweden as of 2023.
What is the difference in meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), per square between Sweden and Zimbabwe?
0 kt per square kilometre, with Zimbabwe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Sweden and Zimbabwe?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Sweden and Zimbabwe rank globally for meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), per square?
Sweden ranks 125th and Zimbabwe ranks 124th of 159 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Sweden vs Zimbabwe: Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 26 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-sheep-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-co2eq-ar5-per-square-kilometre/sweden/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-sheep-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-co2eq-ar5-per-square-kilometre/sweden/zimbabwe/">Sweden vs Zimbabwe: Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre
Unit
kt per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
160 places, 9,116 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.