Australia vs Kazakhstan: Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per unit

Australia
0 kt per US$ of GDP
in 2023
Kazakhstan
0 kt per US$ of GDP
in 2023
Australia rank
40th
Kazakhstan rank
42nd

Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per unit over time

  • Australia
  • Kazakhstan
0000196119922023

How they compare

Australia currently reports 0 kt per US$ of GDP against 0 kt per US$ of GDP in Kazakhstan, a difference of 0 kt per US$ of GDP.

The two have swapped places 7 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Kazakhstan ahead.

Australia ranks 40th and Kazakhstan ranks 42nd of 158 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Australia averaged higher in 1 and Kazakhstan in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia Kazakhstan Difference Ahead
1990s 0 kt per US$ of GDP 0 kt per US$ of GDP 0 kt per US$ of GDP Kazakhstan
2000s 0 kt per US$ of GDP 0 kt per US$ of GDP 0 kt per US$ of GDP Australia
2010s 0 kt per US$ of GDP 0 kt per US$ of GDP 0 kt per US$ of GDP Kazakhstan
2020s 0 kt per US$ of GDP 0 kt per US$ of GDP 0 kt per US$ of GDP Kazakhstan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), per unit, Australia or Kazakhstan?
Australia, at 0 kt per US$ of GDP against 0 kt per US$ of GDP in Kazakhstan as of 2023.
What is the difference in meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), per unit between Australia and Kazakhstan?
0 kt per US$ of GDP, with Australia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Kazakhstan?
32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
How do Australia and Kazakhstan rank globally for meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), per unit?
Australia ranks 40th and Kazakhstan ranks 42nd of 158 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia vs Kazakhstan: Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per unit. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 26 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-sheep-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-co2eq-ar5-per-unit-of-gdp/australia/kazakhstan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-sheep-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-co2eq-ar5-per-unit-of-gdp/australia/kazakhstan/">Australia vs Kazakhstan: Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per unit</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per unit of GDP
Unit
kt per US$ of GDP
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
159 places, 8,529 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.