Australia vs Madagascar: Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per unit

Australia
0 kt per US$ of GDP
in 2023
Madagascar
0 kt per US$ of GDP
in 2023
Australia rank
40th
Madagascar rank
43rd

Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per unit over time

  • Australia
  • Madagascar
0000196119922023

How they compare

Australia currently reports 0 kt per US$ of GDP against 0 kt per US$ of GDP in Madagascar, a difference of 0 kt per US$ of GDP.

That makes Australia's figure about 1.1 times Madagascar's.

Across all 63 years both countries report, Australia has been ahead every year.

Australia ranks 40th and Madagascar ranks 43rd of 158 countries.

Australia has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia Madagascar Difference Ahead
1960s 0 kt per US$ of GDP 0 kt per US$ of GDP 0 kt per US$ of GDP Australia
1970s 0 kt per US$ of GDP 0 kt per US$ of GDP 0 kt per US$ of GDP Australia
1980s 0 kt per US$ of GDP 0 kt per US$ of GDP 0 kt per US$ of GDP Australia
1990s 0 kt per US$ of GDP 0 kt per US$ of GDP 0 kt per US$ of GDP Australia
2000s 0 kt per US$ of GDP 0 kt per US$ of GDP 0 kt per US$ of GDP Australia
2010s 0 kt per US$ of GDP 0 kt per US$ of GDP 0 kt per US$ of GDP Australia
2020s 0 kt per US$ of GDP 0 kt per US$ of GDP 0 kt per US$ of GDP Australia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), per unit, Australia or Madagascar?
Australia, at 0 kt per US$ of GDP against 0 kt per US$ of GDP in Madagascar as of 2023.
What is the difference in meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), per unit between Australia and Madagascar?
0 kt per US$ of GDP, with Australia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Madagascar?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Australia and Madagascar rank globally for meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), per unit?
Australia ranks 40th and Madagascar ranks 43rd of 158 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia vs Madagascar: Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per unit. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 27 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-sheep-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-co2eq-ar5-per-unit-of-gdp/australia/madagascar/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-sheep-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-co2eq-ar5-per-unit-of-gdp/australia/madagascar/">Australia vs Madagascar: Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per unit</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per unit of GDP
Unit
kt per US$ of GDP
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
159 places, 8,529 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.