How many years of comparable data are there for Austria and Belarus?

32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Austria vs Belarus: Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per unit

Austria

0 kt per US$ of GDP

in 2023

Belarus

0 kt per US$ of GDP

in 2023

Austria rank

129th

Belarus rank

126th

Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per unit over time

Austria
Belarus

How they compare

Belarus currently reports 0 kt per US$ of GDP against 0 kt per US$ of GDP in Austria, a difference of 0 kt per US$ of GDP.

That makes Belarus's figure about 1.5 times Austria's.

Across all 32 years both countries report, Belarus has been ahead every year.

Austria ranks 129th and Belarus ranks 126th of 158 countries.

Belarus has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Austria	Belarus	Difference	Ahead
1990s	0 kt per US$ of GDP	0 kt per US$ of GDP	0 kt per US$ of GDP	Belarus
2000s	0 kt per US$ of GDP	0 kt per US$ of GDP	0 kt per US$ of GDP	Belarus
2010s	0 kt per US$ of GDP	0 kt per US$ of GDP	0 kt per US$ of GDP	Belarus
2020s	0 kt per US$ of GDP	0 kt per US$ of GDP	0 kt per US$ of GDP	Belarus

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), per unit, Austria or Belarus?: Belarus, at 0 kt per US$ of GDP against 0 kt per US$ of GDP in Austria as of 2023.
What is the difference in meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), per unit between Austria and Belarus?: 0 kt per US$ of GDP, with Belarus ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Austria and Belarus?: 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
How do Austria and Belarus rank globally for meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), per unit?: Austria ranks 129th and Belarus ranks 126th of 158 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Austria vs Belarus: Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per unit. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 26 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-sheep-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-co2eq-ar5-per-unit-of-gdp/austria/belarus/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-sheep-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-co2eq-ar5-per-unit-of-gdp/austria/belarus/">Austria vs Belarus: Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per unit</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per unit of GDP
Unit: kt per US$ of GDP
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 159 places, 8,529 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed: 26 September 2026

Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.