Barbados vs Belarus: Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per unit

Barbados
0 kt per US$ of GDP
in 2023
Belarus
0 kt per US$ of GDP
in 2023
Barbados rank
123rd
Belarus rank
126th

Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per unit over time

  • Barbados
  • Belarus
000000196119922023

How they compare

Barbados currently reports 0 kt per US$ of GDP against 0 kt per US$ of GDP in Belarus, a difference of 0 kt per US$ of GDP.

That makes Barbados's figure about 1.2 times Belarus's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Belarus ahead.

Barbados ranks 123rd and Belarus ranks 126th of 158 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Barbados averaged higher in 2 and Belarus in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Barbados Belarus Difference Ahead
1990s 0 kt per US$ of GDP 0 kt per US$ of GDP 0 kt per US$ of GDP Belarus
2000s 0 kt per US$ of GDP 0 kt per US$ of GDP 0 kt per US$ of GDP Belarus
2010s 0 kt per US$ of GDP 0 kt per US$ of GDP 0 kt per US$ of GDP Barbados
2020s 0 kt per US$ of GDP 0 kt per US$ of GDP 0 kt per US$ of GDP Barbados

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), per unit, Barbados or Belarus?
Barbados, at 0 kt per US$ of GDP against 0 kt per US$ of GDP in Belarus as of 2023.
What is the difference in meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), per unit between Barbados and Belarus?
0 kt per US$ of GDP, with Barbados ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Barbados and Belarus?
32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
How do Barbados and Belarus rank globally for meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), per unit?
Barbados ranks 123rd and Belarus ranks 126th of 158 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Barbados vs Belarus: Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per unit. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 26 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-sheep-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-co2eq-ar5-per-unit-of-gdp/barbados/belarus/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-sheep-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-co2eq-ar5-per-unit-of-gdp/barbados/belarus/">Barbados vs Belarus: Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per unit</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per unit of GDP
Unit
kt per US$ of GDP
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
159 places, 8,529 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.