How many years of comparable data are there for Barbados and Estonia?

31 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2023.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Barbados vs Estonia: Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per unit

Barbados

0 kt per US$ of GDP

in 2023

Estonia

0 kt per US$ of GDP

in 2023

Barbados rank

123rd

Estonia rank

122nd

Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per unit over time

Barbados
Estonia

How they compare

Estonia currently reports 0 kt per US$ of GDP against 0 kt per US$ of GDP in Barbados, a difference of 0 kt per US$ of GDP.

That makes Estonia's figure about 1.1 times Barbados's.

Across all 31 years both countries report, Estonia has been ahead every year.

Barbados ranks 123rd and Estonia ranks 122nd of 158 countries.

Estonia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Barbados	Estonia	Difference	Ahead
1990s	0 kt per US$ of GDP	0 kt per US$ of GDP	0 kt per US$ of GDP	Estonia
2000s	0 kt per US$ of GDP	0 kt per US$ of GDP	0 kt per US$ of GDP	Estonia
2010s	0 kt per US$ of GDP	0 kt per US$ of GDP	0 kt per US$ of GDP	Estonia
2020s	0 kt per US$ of GDP	0 kt per US$ of GDP	0 kt per US$ of GDP	Estonia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), per unit, Barbados or Estonia?: Estonia, at 0 kt per US$ of GDP against 0 kt per US$ of GDP in Barbados as of 2023.
What is the difference in meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), per unit between Barbados and Estonia?: 0 kt per US$ of GDP, with Estonia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Barbados and Estonia?: 31 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2023.
How do Barbados and Estonia rank globally for meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), per unit?: Barbados ranks 123rd and Estonia ranks 122nd of 158 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Barbados vs Estonia: Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per unit. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 26 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-sheep-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-co2eq-ar5-per-unit-of-gdp/barbados/estonia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-sheep-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-co2eq-ar5-per-unit-of-gdp/barbados/estonia/">Barbados vs Estonia: Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per unit</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per unit of GDP
Unit: kt per US$ of GDP
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 159 places, 8,529 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed: 26 September 2026

Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.