Belgium vs New Caledonia: Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per unit

Belgium
0 kt per US$ of GDP
in 2022
New Caledonia
0 kt per US$ of GDP
in 2023
Belgium rank
144th
New Caledonia rank
147th

Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per unit over time

  • Belgium
  • New Caledonia
000000196519942023

How they compare

Belgium currently reports 0 kt per US$ of GDP against 0 kt per US$ of GDP in New Caledonia, a difference of 0 kt per US$ of GDP.

That makes Belgium's figure about 1.4 times New Caledonia's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 20 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Belgium ahead.

Belgium ranks 144th and New Caledonia ranks 147th of 158 countries.

Belgium has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Belgium New Caledonia Difference Ahead
2000s 0 kt per US$ of GDP 0 kt per US$ of GDP 0 kt per US$ of GDP Belgium
2010s 0 kt per US$ of GDP 0 kt per US$ of GDP 0 kt per US$ of GDP Belgium
2020s 0 kt per US$ of GDP 0 kt per US$ of GDP 0 kt per US$ of GDP Belgium

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), per unit, Belgium or New Caledonia?
Belgium, at 0 kt per US$ of GDP against 0 kt per US$ of GDP in New Caledonia as of 2022.
What is the difference in meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), per unit between Belgium and New Caledonia?
0 kt per US$ of GDP, with Belgium ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Belgium and New Caledonia?
20 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2022.
How do Belgium and New Caledonia rank globally for meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), per unit?
Belgium ranks 144th and New Caledonia ranks 147th of 158 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Belgium vs New Caledonia: Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per unit. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 27 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-sheep-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-co2eq-ar5-per-unit-of-gdp/belgium/new-caledonia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-sheep-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-co2eq-ar5-per-unit-of-gdp/belgium/new-caledonia/">Belgium vs New Caledonia: Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per unit</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per unit of GDP
Unit
kt per US$ of GDP
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
159 places, 8,529 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.