Belgium vs Papua New Guinea: Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per unit

Belgium
0 kt per US$ of GDP
in 2022
Papua New Guinea
0 kt per US$ of GDP
in 2023
Belgium rank
144th
Papua New Guinea rank
146th

Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per unit over time

  • Belgium
  • Papua New Guinea
0000196119922023

How they compare

Belgium currently reports 0 kt per US$ of GDP against 0 kt per US$ of GDP in Papua New Guinea, a difference of 0 kt per US$ of GDP.

That makes Belgium's figure about 1.2 times Papua New Guinea's.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 20 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Papua New Guinea ahead.

Belgium ranks 144th and Papua New Guinea ranks 146th of 158 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Belgium averaged higher in 1 and Papua New Guinea in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Belgium Papua New Guinea Difference Ahead
2000s 0 kt per US$ of GDP 0 kt per US$ of GDP 0 kt per US$ of GDP Papua New Guinea
2010s 0 kt per US$ of GDP 0 kt per US$ of GDP 0 kt per US$ of GDP Papua New Guinea
2020s 0 kt per US$ of GDP 0 kt per US$ of GDP 0 kt per US$ of GDP Belgium

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), per unit, Belgium or Papua New Guinea?
Belgium, at 0 kt per US$ of GDP against 0 kt per US$ of GDP in Papua New Guinea as of 2022.
What is the difference in meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), per unit between Belgium and Papua New Guinea?
0 kt per US$ of GDP, with Belgium ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Belgium and Papua New Guinea?
20 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2022.
How do Belgium and Papua New Guinea rank globally for meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), per unit?
Belgium ranks 144th and Papua New Guinea ranks 146th of 158 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Belgium vs Papua New Guinea: Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per unit. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 27 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-sheep-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-co2eq-ar5-per-unit-of-gdp/belgium/papua-new-guinea/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-sheep-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-co2eq-ar5-per-unit-of-gdp/belgium/papua-new-guinea/">Belgium vs Papua New Guinea: Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per unit</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per unit of GDP
Unit
kt per US$ of GDP
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
159 places, 8,529 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.