China vs Congo: Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per unit

China
0 kt per US$ of GDP
in 2023
Congo
0 kt per US$ of GDP
in 2023
China rank
84th
Congo rank
85th

Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per unit over time

  • China
  • Congo
00000196119922023

How they compare

China currently reports 0 kt per US$ of GDP against 0 kt per US$ of GDP in Congo, a difference of 0 kt per US$ of GDP.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was China ahead.

China ranks 84th and Congo ranks 85th of 158 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, China averaged higher in 6 and Congo in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade China Congo Difference Ahead
1960s 0 kt per US$ of GDP 0 kt per US$ of GDP 0 kt per US$ of GDP China
1970s 0 kt per US$ of GDP 0 kt per US$ of GDP 0 kt per US$ of GDP China
1980s 0 kt per US$ of GDP 0 kt per US$ of GDP 0 kt per US$ of GDP China
1990s 0 kt per US$ of GDP 0 kt per US$ of GDP 0 kt per US$ of GDP China
2000s 0 kt per US$ of GDP 0 kt per US$ of GDP 0 kt per US$ of GDP China
2010s 0 kt per US$ of GDP 0 kt per US$ of GDP 0 kt per US$ of GDP China
2020s 0 kt per US$ of GDP 0 kt per US$ of GDP 0 kt per US$ of GDP Congo

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), per unit, China or Congo?
China, at 0 kt per US$ of GDP against 0 kt per US$ of GDP in Congo as of 2023.
What is the difference in meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), per unit between China and Congo?
0 kt per US$ of GDP, with China ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for China and Congo?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do China and Congo rank globally for meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), per unit?
China ranks 84th and Congo ranks 85th of 158 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

China vs Congo: Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per unit. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 27 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-sheep-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-co2eq-ar5-per-unit-of-gdp/china/congo-rep/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-sheep-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-co2eq-ar5-per-unit-of-gdp/china/congo-rep/">China vs Congo: Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per unit</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per unit of GDP
Unit
kt per US$ of GDP
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
159 places, 8,529 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.