Eswatini vs Saint Lucia: Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per unit

Eswatini
0 kt per US$ of GDP
in 2023
Saint Lucia
0 kt per US$ of GDP
in 2023
Eswatini rank
108th
Saint Lucia rank
107th

Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per unit over time

  • Eswatini
  • Saint Lucia
00000196119922023

How they compare

Saint Lucia currently reports 0 kt per US$ of GDP against 0 kt per US$ of GDP in Eswatini, a difference of 0 kt per US$ of GDP.

The two have swapped places 12 times across 44 shared years of data; in 1980 it was Saint Lucia ahead.

Eswatini ranks 108th and Saint Lucia ranks 107th of 158 countries.

Across the 5 decades both report, Eswatini averaged higher in 2 and Saint Lucia in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Eswatini Saint Lucia Difference Ahead
1980s 0 kt per US$ of GDP 0 kt per US$ of GDP 0 kt per US$ of GDP Eswatini
1990s 0 kt per US$ of GDP 0 kt per US$ of GDP 0 kt per US$ of GDP Saint Lucia
2000s 0 kt per US$ of GDP 0 kt per US$ of GDP 0 kt per US$ of GDP Eswatini
2010s 0 kt per US$ of GDP 0 kt per US$ of GDP 0 kt per US$ of GDP Saint Lucia
2020s 0 kt per US$ of GDP 0 kt per US$ of GDP 0 kt per US$ of GDP Saint Lucia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), per unit, Eswatini or Saint Lucia?
Saint Lucia, at 0 kt per US$ of GDP against 0 kt per US$ of GDP in Eswatini as of 2023.
What is the difference in meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), per unit between Eswatini and Saint Lucia?
0 kt per US$ of GDP, with Saint Lucia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Eswatini and Saint Lucia?
44 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2023.
How do Eswatini and Saint Lucia rank globally for meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), per unit?
Eswatini ranks 108th and Saint Lucia ranks 107th of 158 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Eswatini vs Saint Lucia: Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per unit. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 27 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-sheep-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-co2eq-ar5-per-unit-of-gdp/eswatini/st-lucia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-sheep-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-co2eq-ar5-per-unit-of-gdp/eswatini/st-lucia/">Eswatini vs Saint Lucia: Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per unit</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per unit of GDP
Unit
kt per US$ of GDP
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
159 places, 8,529 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.