Guinea-Bissau vs Namibia: Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per unit

Guinea-Bissau
0 kt per US$ of GDP
in 2023
Namibia
0 kt per US$ of GDP
in 2023
Guinea-Bissau rank
20th
Namibia rank
22nd

Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per unit over time

  • Guinea-Bissau
  • Namibia
00000197019962023

How they compare

Guinea-Bissau currently reports 0 kt per US$ of GDP against 0 kt per US$ of GDP in Namibia, a difference of 0 kt per US$ of GDP.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 44 shared years of data; in 1980 it was Namibia ahead.

Guinea-Bissau ranks 20th and Namibia ranks 22nd of 158 countries.

Across the 5 decades both report, Guinea-Bissau averaged higher in 2 and Namibia in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Guinea-Bissau Namibia Difference Ahead
1980s 0 kt per US$ of GDP 0 kt per US$ of GDP 0 kt per US$ of GDP Namibia
1990s 0 kt per US$ of GDP 0 kt per US$ of GDP 0 kt per US$ of GDP Namibia
2000s 0 kt per US$ of GDP 0 kt per US$ of GDP 0 kt per US$ of GDP Namibia
2010s 0 kt per US$ of GDP 0 kt per US$ of GDP 0 kt per US$ of GDP Guinea-Bissau
2020s 0 kt per US$ of GDP 0 kt per US$ of GDP 0 kt per US$ of GDP Guinea-Bissau

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), per unit, Guinea-Bissau or Namibia?
Guinea-Bissau, at 0 kt per US$ of GDP against 0 kt per US$ of GDP in Namibia as of 2023.
What is the difference in meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), per unit between Guinea-Bissau and Namibia?
0 kt per US$ of GDP, with Guinea-Bissau ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Guinea-Bissau and Namibia?
44 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2023.
How do Guinea-Bissau and Namibia rank globally for meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), per unit?
Guinea-Bissau ranks 20th and Namibia ranks 22nd of 158 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Guinea-Bissau vs Namibia: Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per unit. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 27 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-sheep-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-co2eq-ar5-per-unit-of-gdp/guinea-bissau/namibia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-sheep-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-co2eq-ar5-per-unit-of-gdp/guinea-bissau/namibia/">Guinea-Bissau vs Namibia: Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per unit</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per unit of GDP
Unit
kt per US$ of GDP
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
159 places, 8,529 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.