Barbados vs Sri Lanka: Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq)

Barbados
2.89 kt
in 2023
Sri Lanka
2.86 kt
in 2023
Barbados rank
152nd
Sri Lanka rank
153rd

Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) over time

  • Barbados
  • Sri Lanka
051015196119922023

How they compare

Barbados currently reports 2.89 kt against 2.86 kt in Sri Lanka, a difference of 0.03 kt.

The two have swapped places 7 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Sri Lanka ahead.

Barbados ranks 152nd and Sri Lanka ranks 153rd of 179 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Barbados averaged higher in 5 and Sri Lanka in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Barbados Sri Lanka Difference Ahead
1960s 8.55 kt 7.93 kt 0.6205 kt Barbados
1970s 10.21 kt 6.02 kt 4.18 kt Barbados
1980s 9.42 kt 6.27 kt 3.15 kt Barbados
1990s 1.48 kt 3.71 kt 2.23 kt Sri Lanka
2000s 2.08 kt 2.46 kt 0.3788 kt Sri Lanka
2010s 2.77 kt 2.1 kt 0.6679 kt Barbados
2020s 2.89 kt 2.68 kt 0.2183 kt Barbados

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq), Barbados or Sri Lanka?
Barbados, at 2.89 kt against 2.86 kt in Sri Lanka as of 2023.
What is the difference in meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq) between Barbados and Sri Lanka?
0.03 kt, with Barbados ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Barbados and Sri Lanka?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Barbados and Sri Lanka rank globally for meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq)?
Barbados ranks 152nd and Sri Lanka ranks 153rd of 179 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Barbados vs Sri Lanka: Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq). Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 05 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-sheep-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-co2eq-ar5/barbados/sri-lanka/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-sheep-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-co2eq-ar5/barbados/sri-lanka/">Barbados vs Sri Lanka: Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5)
Unit
kt
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
224 places, 12,747 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions intensities contains analytical data on the intensity of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions by agricultural commodity. This indicator is defined as greenhouse gas emissions per kg of product. Data are available for a set of agricultural commodities (e.g. rice and other cereals, meat, milk, eggs), by country, with global coverage.