Australia vs Malta: Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — Emissions intensity, annual growth

Australia
-14.18 % change on previous year
in 2023
Malta
-16.86 % change on previous year
in 2023
Australia rank
174th
Malta rank
176th

Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — Emissions intensity, annual growth over time

  • Australia
  • Malta
-1000100200300400196219922023

How they compare

Australia currently reports -14.18 % change on previous year against -16.86 % change on previous year in Malta, a difference of 2.68 % change on previous year.

The two have swapped places 30 times across 62 shared years of data; in 1962 it was Australia ahead.

Australia ranks 174th and Malta ranks 176th of 193 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Australia averaged higher in 1 and Malta in 6.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia Malta Difference Ahead
1960s -0.0615 % change on previous year 0.8167 % change on previous year 0.8782 % change on previous year Malta
1970s 2.43 % change on previous year 3.92 % change on previous year 1.49 % change on previous year Malta
1980s 1.41 % change on previous year 35.24 % change on previous year 33.83 % change on previous year Malta
1990s -4.55 % change on previous year 17.46 % change on previous year 22.01 % change on previous year Malta
2000s -4.33 % change on previous year 18.73 % change on previous year 23.05 % change on previous year Malta
2010s -1.89 % change on previous year -11.36 % change on previous year 9.47 % change on previous year Australia
2020s -1.03 % change on previous year 2.96 % change on previous year 3.98 % change on previous year Malta

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — emissions intensity, annual growth, Australia or Malta?
Australia, at -14.18 % change on previous year against -16.86 % change on previous year in Malta as of 2023.
What is the difference in meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — emissions intensity, annual growth between Australia and Malta?
2.68 % change on previous year, with Australia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Malta?
62 years are reported by both, from 1962 to 2023.
How do Australia and Malta rank globally for meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — emissions intensity, annual growth?
Australia ranks 174th and Malta ranks 176th of 193 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — Emissions intensity, annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia vs Malta: Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — Emissions intensity, annual growth. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 26 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-sheep-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-intensity-annual-growth-rate/australia/malta/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-sheep-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-intensity-annual-growth-rate/australia/malta/">Australia vs Malta: Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — Emissions intensity, annual growth</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — Emissions intensity, annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
223 places, 12,366 data points, 1962–2023
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — Emissions intensity. Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.