Least Developed Countries (LDCs) vs Saint Vincent and the Grenadines: Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — Emissions intensity, annual growth
Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — Emissions intensity, annual growth over time
- Least Developed Countries (LDCs)
- Saint Vincent and the Grenadines
How they compare
Saint Vincent and the Grenadines currently reports 52.82 % change on previous year against 2.87 % change on previous year in Least Developed Countries (LDCs), a difference of 49.95 % change on previous year.
That makes Saint Vincent and the Grenadines's figure about 18.4 times Least Developed Countries (LDCs)'s.
The two have swapped places 32 times across 62 shared years of data; in 1962 it was Saint Vincent and the Grenadines ahead.
Least Developed Countries (LDCs) ranks 7th and Saint Vincent and the Grenadines ranks 4th of 30 groups.
Across the 7 decades both report, Least Developed Countries (LDCs) averaged higher in 3 and Saint Vincent and the Grenadines in 4.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Least Developed Countries (LDCs) | Saint Vincent and the Grenadines | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | -0.4146 % change on previous year | 0.6013 % change on previous year | 1.02 % change on previous year | Saint Vincent and the Grenadines |
| 1970s | -1.97 % change on previous year | 9.52 % change on previous year | 11.49 % change on previous year | Saint Vincent and the Grenadines |
| 1980s | 0.0947 % change on previous year | -2.49 % change on previous year | 2.59 % change on previous year | Least Developed Countries (LDCs) |
| 1990s | -2.39 % change on previous year | 0.0433 % change on previous year | 2.44 % change on previous year | Saint Vincent and the Grenadines |
| 2000s | 1.05 % change on previous year | -0.3099 % change on previous year | 1.36 % change on previous year | Least Developed Countries (LDCs) |
| 2010s | 1.56 % change on previous year | -2.21 % change on previous year | 3.77 % change on previous year | Least Developed Countries (LDCs) |
| 2020s | 1.58 % change on previous year | 7.56 % change on previous year | 5.98 % change on previous year | Saint Vincent and the Grenadines |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — emissions intensity, annual growth, Least Developed Countries (LDCs) or Saint Vincent and the Grenadines?
- Saint Vincent and the Grenadines, at 52.82 % change on previous year against 2.87 % change on previous year in Least Developed Countries (LDCs) as of 2023.
- What is the difference in meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — emissions intensity, annual growth between Least Developed Countries (LDCs) and Saint Vincent and the Grenadines?
- 49.95 % change on previous year, with Saint Vincent and the Grenadines ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Least Developed Countries (LDCs) and Saint Vincent and the Grenadines?
- 62 years are reported by both, from 1962 to 2023.
- How do Least Developed Countries (LDCs) and Saint Vincent and the Grenadines rank globally for meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — emissions intensity, annual growth?
- Least Developed Countries (LDCs) ranks 7th and Saint Vincent and the Grenadines ranks 4th of 30 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — Emissions intensity, annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The year-on-year percentage change in Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — Emissions intensity. Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.