Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) vs Namibia: Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — Emissions intensity, annual growth
Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — Emissions intensity, annual growth over time
- Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
- Namibia
How they compare
Namibia currently reports 30.32 % change on previous year against 1.26 % change on previous year in Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs), a difference of 29.06 % change on previous year.
That makes Namibia's figure about 24.0 times Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)'s.
The two have swapped places 36 times across 62 shared years of data; in 1962 it was Namibia ahead.
Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) ranks 10th and Namibia ranks 11th of 30 groups.
Across the 7 decades both report, Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) averaged higher in 1 and Namibia in 6.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) | Namibia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | -0.3673 % change on previous year | -0.0056 % change on previous year | 0.3616 % change on previous year | Namibia |
| 1970s | -2.36 % change on previous year | -0.9514 % change on previous year | 1.41 % change on previous year | Namibia |
| 1980s | -0.067 % change on previous year | 2.27 % change on previous year | 2.34 % change on previous year | Namibia |
| 1990s | -3.01 % change on previous year | 2.83 % change on previous year | 5.84 % change on previous year | Namibia |
| 2000s | 1.47 % change on previous year | 9.12 % change on previous year | 7.65 % change on previous year | Namibia |
| 2010s | 1.19 % change on previous year | -0.6876 % change on previous year | 1.87 % change on previous year | Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) |
| 2020s | -0.096 % change on previous year | 7.48 % change on previous year | 7.57 % change on previous year | Namibia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — emissions intensity, annual growth, Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) or Namibia?
- Namibia, at 30.32 % change on previous year against 1.26 % change on previous year in Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) as of 2023.
- What is the difference in meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — emissions intensity, annual growth between Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) and Namibia?
- 29.06 % change on previous year, with Namibia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) and Namibia?
- 62 years are reported by both, from 1962 to 2023.
- How do Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) and Namibia rank globally for meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — emissions intensity, annual growth?
- Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) ranks 10th and Namibia ranks 11th of 30 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — Emissions intensity, annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The year-on-year percentage change in Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — Emissions intensity. Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.