Russian Federation vs Suriname: Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — Emissions intensity, annual growth

Russian Federation
2.33 % change on previous year
in 2023
Suriname
3.37 % change on previous year
in 2023
Russian Federation rank
42nd
Suriname rank
39th

Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — Emissions intensity, annual growth over time

  • Russian Federation
  • Suriname
-200204060196219922023

How they compare

Suriname currently reports 3.37 % change on previous year against 2.33 % change on previous year in Russian Federation, a difference of 1.04 % change on previous year.

That makes Suriname's figure about 1.4 times Russian Federation's.

The two have swapped places 12 times across 31 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Suriname ahead.

Russian Federation ranks 42nd and Suriname ranks 39th of 193 countries.

Suriname has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Russian Federation Suriname Difference Ahead
1990s -6.38 % change on previous year 1.85 % change on previous year 8.22 % change on previous year Suriname
2000s 1.49 % change on previous year 4.94 % change on previous year 3.45 % change on previous year Suriname
2010s -1.72 % change on previous year 3.4 % change on previous year 5.12 % change on previous year Suriname
2020s -1.52 % change on previous year 4.68 % change on previous year 6.2 % change on previous year Suriname

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — emissions intensity, annual growth, Russian Federation or Suriname?
Suriname, at 3.37 % change on previous year against 2.33 % change on previous year in Russian Federation as of 2023.
What is the difference in meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — emissions intensity, annual growth between Russian Federation and Suriname?
1.04 % change on previous year, with Suriname ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Russian Federation and Suriname?
31 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2023.
How do Russian Federation and Suriname rank globally for meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — emissions intensity, annual growth?
Russian Federation ranks 42nd and Suriname ranks 39th of 193 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — Emissions intensity, annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Russian Federation vs Suriname: Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — Emissions intensity, annual growth. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 26 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-sheep-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-intensity-annual-growth-rate/russian-federation-2/suriname/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-sheep-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-intensity-annual-growth-rate/russian-federation-2/suriname/">Russian Federation vs Suriname: Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — Emissions intensity, annual growth</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — Emissions intensity, annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
223 places, 12,366 data points, 1962–2023
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — Emissions intensity. Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.