Cuba vs South Africa: Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — Production, per square kilometre

Cuba
0.116 t per square kilometre
in 2023
South Africa
0.1154 t per square kilometre
in 2023
Cuba rank
46th
South Africa rank
48th

Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — Production, per square kilometre over time

  • Cuba
  • South Africa
00.050.10.15196119922023

How they compare

Cuba currently reports 0.116 t per square kilometre against 0.1154 t per square kilometre in South Africa, a difference of 0.0006 t per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was South Africa ahead.

Cuba ranks 46th and South Africa ranks 48th of 160 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Cuba averaged higher in 1 and South Africa in 6.

Head to head by decade

Decade Cuba South Africa Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0082 t per square kilometre 0.1023 t per square kilometre 0.0941 t per square kilometre South Africa
1970s 0.0107 t per square kilometre 0.1138 t per square kilometre 0.1031 t per square kilometre South Africa
1980s 0.0168 t per square kilometre 0.1074 t per square kilometre 0.0906 t per square kilometre South Africa
1990s 0.0437 t per square kilometre 0.1045 t per square kilometre 0.0608 t per square kilometre South Africa
2000s 0.0684 t per square kilometre 0.1103 t per square kilometre 0.0419 t per square kilometre South Africa
2010s 0.0967 t per square kilometre 0.1351 t per square kilometre 0.0384 t per square kilometre South Africa
2020s 0.1284 t per square kilometre 0.1249 t per square kilometre 0.0035 t per square kilometre Cuba

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — production, per square kilometre, Cuba or South Africa?
Cuba, at 0.116 t per square kilometre against 0.1154 t per square kilometre in South Africa as of 2023.
What is the difference in meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — production, per square kilometre between Cuba and South Africa?
0.0006 t per square kilometre, with Cuba ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cuba and South Africa?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Cuba and South Africa rank globally for meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — production, per square kilometre?
Cuba ranks 46th and South Africa ranks 48th of 160 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — Production, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Cuba vs South Africa: Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — Production, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 27 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-sheep-fresh-or-chilled-production-per-square-kilometre-2/cuba/south-africa/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-sheep-fresh-or-chilled-production-per-square-kilometre-2/cuba/south-africa/">Cuba vs South Africa: Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — Production, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — Production, per square kilometre
Unit
t per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
161 places, 9,152 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — Production divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.