Equatorial Guinea vs Gabon: Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — Production, per square kilometre

Equatorial Guinea
0.0038 t per square kilometre
in 2023
Gabon
0.0033 t per square kilometre
in 2023
Equatorial Guinea rank
133rd
Gabon rank
136th

Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — Production, per square kilometre over time

  • Equatorial Guinea
  • Gabon
00.0010.0020.0030.004196119922023

How they compare

Equatorial Guinea currently reports 0.0038 t per square kilometre against 0.0033 t per square kilometre in Gabon, a difference of 0.0005 t per square kilometre.

That makes Equatorial Guinea's figure about 1.2 times Gabon's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Equatorial Guinea ahead.

Equatorial Guinea ranks 133rd and Gabon ranks 136th of 160 countries.

Equatorial Guinea has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Equatorial Guinea Gabon Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0021 t per square kilometre 0.0006 t per square kilometre 0.0015 t per square kilometre Equatorial Guinea
1970s 0.0024 t per square kilometre 0.0009 t per square kilometre 0.0016 t per square kilometre Equatorial Guinea
1980s 0.0027 t per square kilometre 0.0018 t per square kilometre 0.0009 t per square kilometre Equatorial Guinea
1990s 0.0031 t per square kilometre 0.0025 t per square kilometre 0.0006 t per square kilometre Equatorial Guinea
2000s 0.0034 t per square kilometre 0.0028 t per square kilometre 0.0006 t per square kilometre Equatorial Guinea
2010s 0.0036 t per square kilometre 0.003 t per square kilometre 0.0006 t per square kilometre Equatorial Guinea
2020s 0.0038 t per square kilometre 0.0033 t per square kilometre 0.0005 t per square kilometre Equatorial Guinea

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — production, per square kilometre, Equatorial Guinea or Gabon?
Equatorial Guinea, at 0.0038 t per square kilometre against 0.0033 t per square kilometre in Gabon as of 2023.
What is the difference in meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — production, per square kilometre between Equatorial Guinea and Gabon?
0.0005 t per square kilometre, with Equatorial Guinea ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Equatorial Guinea and Gabon?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Equatorial Guinea and Gabon rank globally for meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — production, per square kilometre?
Equatorial Guinea ranks 133rd and Gabon ranks 136th of 160 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — Production, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Equatorial Guinea vs Gabon: Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — Production, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 27 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-sheep-fresh-or-chilled-production-per-square-kilometre-2/equatorial-guinea/gabon/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-sheep-fresh-or-chilled-production-per-square-kilometre-2/equatorial-guinea/gabon/">Equatorial Guinea vs Gabon: Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — Production, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — Production, per square kilometre
Unit
t per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
161 places, 9,152 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — Production divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.