Brazil vs Eswatini: Methane emissions, per square kilometre

Brazil
69.39 tonnes of CO₂ equivalents per square kilometre
in 2024
Eswatini
68.3 tonnes of CO₂ equivalents per square kilometre
in 2024
Brazil rank
115th
Eswatini rank
116th

Methane emissions, per square kilometre over time

  • Brazil
  • Eswatini
20406080100196119922024

How they compare

Brazil currently reports 69.39 tonnes of CO₂ equivalents per square kilometre against 68.3 tonnes of CO₂ equivalents per square kilometre in Eswatini, a difference of 1.09 tonnes of CO₂ equivalents per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 64 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Eswatini ahead.

Brazil ranks 115th and Eswatini ranks 116th of 195 countries.

Eswatini has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Brazil Eswatini Difference Ahead
1960s 19.67 tonnes of CO₂ equivalents per square kilometre 53.94 tonnes of CO₂ equivalents per square kilometre 34.27 tonnes of CO₂ equivalents per square kilometre Eswatini
1970s 27.85 tonnes of CO₂ equivalents per square kilometre 68.87 tonnes of CO₂ equivalents per square kilometre 41.02 tonnes of CO₂ equivalents per square kilometre Eswatini
1980s 39.22 tonnes of CO₂ equivalents per square kilometre 81.71 tonnes of CO₂ equivalents per square kilometre 42.49 tonnes of CO₂ equivalents per square kilometre Eswatini
1990s 46.53 tonnes of CO₂ equivalents per square kilometre 86.32 tonnes of CO₂ equivalents per square kilometre 39.79 tonnes of CO₂ equivalents per square kilometre Eswatini
2000s 56.49 tonnes of CO₂ equivalents per square kilometre 86.35 tonnes of CO₂ equivalents per square kilometre 29.86 tonnes of CO₂ equivalents per square kilometre Eswatini
2010s 61.71 tonnes of CO₂ equivalents per square kilometre 68.68 tonnes of CO₂ equivalents per square kilometre 6.97 tonnes of CO₂ equivalents per square kilometre Eswatini
2020s 66.85 tonnes of CO₂ equivalents per square kilometre 68.05 tonnes of CO₂ equivalents per square kilometre 1.2 tonnes of CO₂ equivalents per square kilometre Eswatini

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher methane emissions, per square kilometre, Brazil or Eswatini?
Brazil, at 69.39 tonnes of CO₂ equivalents per square kilometre against 68.3 tonnes of CO₂ equivalents per square kilometre in Eswatini as of 2024.
What is the difference in methane emissions, per square kilometre between Brazil and Eswatini?
1.09 tonnes of CO₂ equivalents per square kilometre, with Brazil ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Brazil and Eswatini?
64 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2024.
How do Brazil and Eswatini rank globally for methane emissions, per square kilometre?
Brazil ranks 115th and Eswatini ranks 116th of 195 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Methane emissions, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Brazil vs Eswatini: Methane emissions, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 15 November 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/methane-emissions-per-square-kilometre/brazil/eswatini/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/methane-emissions-per-square-kilometre/brazil/eswatini/">Brazil vs Eswatini: Methane emissions, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Methane emissions, per square kilometre
Unit
tonnes of CO₂ equivalents per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
195 places, 11,432 data points, 1961–2024
Last refreshed

Methane emissions divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.