China vs Guatemala: Methane emissions, per square kilometre

China
169.43 tonnes of CO₂ equivalents per square kilometre
in 2024
Guatemala
171.6 tonnes of CO₂ equivalents per square kilometre
in 2024
China rank
44th
Guatemala rank
43rd

Methane emissions, per square kilometre over time

  • China
  • Guatemala
50100150196119922024

How they compare

Guatemala currently reports 171.6 tonnes of CO₂ equivalents per square kilometre against 169.43 tonnes of CO₂ equivalents per square kilometre in China, a difference of 2.17 tonnes of CO₂ equivalents per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 64 shared years of data; in 1961 it was China ahead.

China ranks 44th and Guatemala ranks 43rd of 195 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, China averaged higher in 6 and Guatemala in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade China Guatemala Difference Ahead
1960s 52.68 tonnes of CO₂ equivalents per square kilometre 40.14 tonnes of CO₂ equivalents per square kilometre 12.54 tonnes of CO₂ equivalents per square kilometre China
1970s 69.2 tonnes of CO₂ equivalents per square kilometre 51.15 tonnes of CO₂ equivalents per square kilometre 18.06 tonnes of CO₂ equivalents per square kilometre China
1980s 81.79 tonnes of CO₂ equivalents per square kilometre 64.9 tonnes of CO₂ equivalents per square kilometre 16.89 tonnes of CO₂ equivalents per square kilometre China
1990s 97.03 tonnes of CO₂ equivalents per square kilometre 79.22 tonnes of CO₂ equivalents per square kilometre 17.81 tonnes of CO₂ equivalents per square kilometre China
2000s 114.88 tonnes of CO₂ equivalents per square kilometre 104.02 tonnes of CO₂ equivalents per square kilometre 10.86 tonnes of CO₂ equivalents per square kilometre China
2010s 141.07 tonnes of CO₂ equivalents per square kilometre 139.73 tonnes of CO₂ equivalents per square kilometre 1.34 tonnes of CO₂ equivalents per square kilometre China
2020s 159.67 tonnes of CO₂ equivalents per square kilometre 165.71 tonnes of CO₂ equivalents per square kilometre 6.04 tonnes of CO₂ equivalents per square kilometre Guatemala

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher methane emissions, per square kilometre, China or Guatemala?
Guatemala, at 171.6 tonnes of CO₂ equivalents per square kilometre against 169.43 tonnes of CO₂ equivalents per square kilometre in China as of 2024.
What is the difference in methane emissions, per square kilometre between China and Guatemala?
2.17 tonnes of CO₂ equivalents per square kilometre, with Guatemala ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for China and Guatemala?
64 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2024.
How do China and Guatemala rank globally for methane emissions, per square kilometre?
China ranks 44th and Guatemala ranks 43rd of 195 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Methane emissions, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

China vs Guatemala: Methane emissions, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 15 November 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/methane-emissions-per-square-kilometre/china/guatemala/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/methane-emissions-per-square-kilometre/china/guatemala/">China vs Guatemala: Methane emissions, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Methane emissions, per square kilometre
Unit
tonnes of CO₂ equivalents per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
195 places, 11,432 data points, 1961–2024
Last refreshed

Methane emissions divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.