Ecuador vs Malawi: Methane emissions, per square kilometre

Ecuador
87.17 tonnes of CO₂ equivalents per square kilometre
in 2024
Malawi
88.81 tonnes of CO₂ equivalents per square kilometre
in 2024
Ecuador rank
92nd
Malawi rank
90th

Methane emissions, per square kilometre over time

  • Ecuador
  • Malawi
20406080100196119922024

How they compare

Malawi currently reports 88.81 tonnes of CO₂ equivalents per square kilometre against 87.17 tonnes of CO₂ equivalents per square kilometre in Ecuador, a difference of 1.64 tonnes of CO₂ equivalents per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 64 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Ecuador ahead.

Ecuador ranks 92nd and Malawi ranks 90th of 195 countries.

Ecuador has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Ecuador Malawi Difference Ahead
1960s 21.53 tonnes of CO₂ equivalents per square kilometre 15.49 tonnes of CO₂ equivalents per square kilometre 6.05 tonnes of CO₂ equivalents per square kilometre Ecuador
1970s 35.52 tonnes of CO₂ equivalents per square kilometre 19.16 tonnes of CO₂ equivalents per square kilometre 16.36 tonnes of CO₂ equivalents per square kilometre Ecuador
1980s 52.75 tonnes of CO₂ equivalents per square kilometre 23.84 tonnes of CO₂ equivalents per square kilometre 28.91 tonnes of CO₂ equivalents per square kilometre Ecuador
1990s 76.34 tonnes of CO₂ equivalents per square kilometre 35.66 tonnes of CO₂ equivalents per square kilometre 40.68 tonnes of CO₂ equivalents per square kilometre Ecuador
2000s 88.29 tonnes of CO₂ equivalents per square kilometre 43.28 tonnes of CO₂ equivalents per square kilometre 45 tonnes of CO₂ equivalents per square kilometre Ecuador
2010s 97.16 tonnes of CO₂ equivalents per square kilometre 62.54 tonnes of CO₂ equivalents per square kilometre 34.61 tonnes of CO₂ equivalents per square kilometre Ecuador
2020s 89.73 tonnes of CO₂ equivalents per square kilometre 84.35 tonnes of CO₂ equivalents per square kilometre 5.38 tonnes of CO₂ equivalents per square kilometre Ecuador

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher methane emissions, per square kilometre, Ecuador or Malawi?
Malawi, at 88.81 tonnes of CO₂ equivalents per square kilometre against 87.17 tonnes of CO₂ equivalents per square kilometre in Ecuador as of 2024.
What is the difference in methane emissions, per square kilometre between Ecuador and Malawi?
1.64 tonnes of CO₂ equivalents per square kilometre, with Malawi ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Malawi?
64 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2024.
How do Ecuador and Malawi rank globally for methane emissions, per square kilometre?
Ecuador ranks 92nd and Malawi ranks 90th of 195 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Methane emissions, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Ecuador vs Malawi: Methane emissions, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 15 November 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/methane-emissions-per-square-kilometre/ecuador/malawi/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/methane-emissions-per-square-kilometre/ecuador/malawi/">Ecuador vs Malawi: Methane emissions, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Methane emissions, per square kilometre
Unit
tonnes of CO₂ equivalents per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
195 places, 11,432 data points, 1961–2024
Last refreshed

Methane emissions divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.