Iceland vs Namibia: Methane emissions, per square kilometre

Iceland
5.52 tonnes of CO₂ equivalents per square kilometre
in 2024
Namibia
7.49 tonnes of CO₂ equivalents per square kilometre
in 2024
Iceland rank
194th
Namibia rank
192nd

Methane emissions, per square kilometre over time

  • Iceland
  • Namibia
02.557.51012.5196119922024

How they compare

Namibia currently reports 7.49 tonnes of CO₂ equivalents per square kilometre against 5.52 tonnes of CO₂ equivalents per square kilometre in Iceland, a difference of 1.97 tonnes of CO₂ equivalents per square kilometre.

That makes Namibia's figure about 1.4 times Iceland's.

The two have swapped places 16 times across 64 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Namibia ahead.

Iceland ranks 194th and Namibia ranks 192nd of 195 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Iceland averaged higher in 4 and Namibia in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Iceland Namibia Difference Ahead
1960s 5.36 tonnes of CO₂ equivalents per square kilometre 5.35 tonnes of CO₂ equivalents per square kilometre 0.0172 tonnes of CO₂ equivalents per square kilometre Iceland
1970s 6.07 tonnes of CO₂ equivalents per square kilometre 5.54 tonnes of CO₂ equivalents per square kilometre 0.5262 tonnes of CO₂ equivalents per square kilometre Iceland
1980s 5.97 tonnes of CO₂ equivalents per square kilometre 4.8 tonnes of CO₂ equivalents per square kilometre 1.16 tonnes of CO₂ equivalents per square kilometre Iceland
1990s 5.94 tonnes of CO₂ equivalents per square kilometre 5.79 tonnes of CO₂ equivalents per square kilometre 0.1547 tonnes of CO₂ equivalents per square kilometre Iceland
2000s 6.36 tonnes of CO₂ equivalents per square kilometre 6.6 tonnes of CO₂ equivalents per square kilometre 0.237 tonnes of CO₂ equivalents per square kilometre Namibia
2010s 6.3 tonnes of CO₂ equivalents per square kilometre 7.28 tonnes of CO₂ equivalents per square kilometre 0.9815 tonnes of CO₂ equivalents per square kilometre Namibia
2020s 5.83 tonnes of CO₂ equivalents per square kilometre 7.27 tonnes of CO₂ equivalents per square kilometre 1.44 tonnes of CO₂ equivalents per square kilometre Namibia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher methane emissions, per square kilometre, Iceland or Namibia?
Namibia, at 7.49 tonnes of CO₂ equivalents per square kilometre against 5.52 tonnes of CO₂ equivalents per square kilometre in Iceland as of 2024.
What is the difference in methane emissions, per square kilometre between Iceland and Namibia?
1.97 tonnes of CO₂ equivalents per square kilometre, with Namibia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Iceland and Namibia?
64 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2024.
How do Iceland and Namibia rank globally for methane emissions, per square kilometre?
Iceland ranks 194th and Namibia ranks 192nd of 195 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Methane emissions, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Iceland vs Namibia: Methane emissions, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 14 November 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/methane-emissions-per-square-kilometre/iceland/namibia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/methane-emissions-per-square-kilometre/iceland/namibia/">Iceland vs Namibia: Methane emissions, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Methane emissions, per square kilometre
Unit
tonnes of CO₂ equivalents per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
195 places, 11,432 data points, 1961–2024
Last refreshed

Methane emissions divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.