Nepal vs Rwanda: Methane emissions, per square kilometre

Nepal
194.67 tonnes of CO₂ equivalents per square kilometre
in 2024
Rwanda
199.86 tonnes of CO₂ equivalents per square kilometre
in 2024
Nepal rank
37th
Rwanda rank
35th

Methane emissions, per square kilometre over time

  • Nepal
  • Rwanda
050100150200196119922024

How they compare

Rwanda currently reports 199.86 tonnes of CO₂ equivalents per square kilometre against 194.67 tonnes of CO₂ equivalents per square kilometre in Nepal, a difference of 5.19 tonnes of CO₂ equivalents per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 64 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Nepal ahead.

Nepal ranks 37th and Rwanda ranks 35th of 195 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Nepal averaged higher in 2 and Rwanda in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade Nepal Rwanda Difference Ahead
1960s 90.38 tonnes of CO₂ equivalents per square kilometre 109.46 tonnes of CO₂ equivalents per square kilometre 19.08 tonnes of CO₂ equivalents per square kilometre Rwanda
1970s 107.67 tonnes of CO₂ equivalents per square kilometre 160.49 tonnes of CO₂ equivalents per square kilometre 52.82 tonnes of CO₂ equivalents per square kilometre Rwanda
1980s 127.88 tonnes of CO₂ equivalents per square kilometre 182.59 tonnes of CO₂ equivalents per square kilometre 54.7 tonnes of CO₂ equivalents per square kilometre Rwanda
1990s 142.35 tonnes of CO₂ equivalents per square kilometre 158.09 tonnes of CO₂ equivalents per square kilometre 15.74 tonnes of CO₂ equivalents per square kilometre Rwanda
2000s 163.86 tonnes of CO₂ equivalents per square kilometre 132.31 tonnes of CO₂ equivalents per square kilometre 31.54 tonnes of CO₂ equivalents per square kilometre Nepal
2010s 184.35 tonnes of CO₂ equivalents per square kilometre 172.59 tonnes of CO₂ equivalents per square kilometre 11.76 tonnes of CO₂ equivalents per square kilometre Nepal
2020s 193.63 tonnes of CO₂ equivalents per square kilometre 199.4 tonnes of CO₂ equivalents per square kilometre 5.77 tonnes of CO₂ equivalents per square kilometre Rwanda

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher methane emissions, per square kilometre, Nepal or Rwanda?
Rwanda, at 199.86 tonnes of CO₂ equivalents per square kilometre against 194.67 tonnes of CO₂ equivalents per square kilometre in Nepal as of 2024.
What is the difference in methane emissions, per square kilometre between Nepal and Rwanda?
5.19 tonnes of CO₂ equivalents per square kilometre, with Rwanda ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Nepal and Rwanda?
64 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2024.
How do Nepal and Rwanda rank globally for methane emissions, per square kilometre?
Nepal ranks 37th and Rwanda ranks 35th of 195 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Methane emissions, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Nepal vs Rwanda: Methane emissions, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 15 November 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/methane-emissions-per-square-kilometre/nepal/rwanda/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/methane-emissions-per-square-kilometre/nepal/rwanda/">Nepal vs Rwanda: Methane emissions, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Methane emissions, per square kilometre
Unit
tonnes of CO₂ equivalents per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
195 places, 11,432 data points, 1961–2024
Last refreshed

Methane emissions divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.