Democratic Republic of Congo vs Malawi: Methane emissions, per unit of GDP

Democratic Republic of Congo
0.0007 tonnes of CO₂ equivalents per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Malawi
0.0007 tonnes of CO₂ equivalents per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Democratic Republic of Congo rank
26th
Malawi rank
25th

Methane emissions, per unit of GDP over time

  • Democratic Republic of Congo
  • Malawi
00.0010.0020.0030.0040.005196019922024

How they compare

Malawi currently reports 0.0007 tonnes of CO₂ equivalents per US$ of GDP against 0.0007 tonnes of CO₂ equivalents per US$ of GDP in Democratic Republic of Congo, a difference of 0 tonnes of CO₂ equivalents per US$ of GDP.

That makes Malawi's figure about 1.1 times Democratic Republic of Congo's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 45 shared years of data; in 1980 it was Democratic Republic of Congo ahead.

Democratic Republic of Congo ranks 26th and Malawi ranks 25th of 193 countries.

Democratic Republic of Congo has averaged higher in every one of the 5 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Democratic Republic of Congo Malawi Difference Ahead
1980s 0.0021 tonnes of CO₂ equivalents per US$ of GDP 0.0012 tonnes of CO₂ equivalents per US$ of GDP 0.0009 tonnes of CO₂ equivalents per US$ of GDP Democratic Republic of Congo
1990s 0.0037 tonnes of CO₂ equivalents per US$ of GDP 0.0013 tonnes of CO₂ equivalents per US$ of GDP 0.0024 tonnes of CO₂ equivalents per US$ of GDP Democratic Republic of Congo
2000s 0.0023 tonnes of CO₂ equivalents per US$ of GDP 0.0009 tonnes of CO₂ equivalents per US$ of GDP 0.0014 tonnes of CO₂ equivalents per US$ of GDP Democratic Republic of Congo
2010s 0.0012 tonnes of CO₂ equivalents per US$ of GDP 0.0006 tonnes of CO₂ equivalents per US$ of GDP 0.0005 tonnes of CO₂ equivalents per US$ of GDP Democratic Republic of Congo
2020s 0.0008 tonnes of CO₂ equivalents per US$ of GDP 0.0007 tonnes of CO₂ equivalents per US$ of GDP 0.0001 tonnes of CO₂ equivalents per US$ of GDP Democratic Republic of Congo

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher methane emissions, per unit of gdp, Democratic Republic of Congo or Malawi?
Malawi, at 0.0007 tonnes of CO₂ equivalents per US$ of GDP against 0.0007 tonnes of CO₂ equivalents per US$ of GDP in Democratic Republic of Congo as of 2024.
What is the difference in methane emissions, per unit of gdp between Democratic Republic of Congo and Malawi?
0 tonnes of CO₂ equivalents per US$ of GDP, with Malawi ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Democratic Republic of Congo and Malawi?
45 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2024.
How do Democratic Republic of Congo and Malawi rank globally for methane emissions, per unit of gdp?
Democratic Republic of Congo ranks 26th and Malawi ranks 25th of 193 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Methane emissions, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Democratic Republic of Congo vs Malawi: Methane emissions, per unit of GDP. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 15 November 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/methane-emissions-per-unit-of-gdp/congo-dem-rep/malawi/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/methane-emissions-per-unit-of-gdp/congo-dem-rep/malawi/">Democratic Republic of Congo vs Malawi: Methane emissions, per unit of GDP</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Methane emissions, per unit of GDP
Unit
tonnes of CO₂ equivalents per US$ of GDP
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
193 places, 10,816 data points, 1960–2024
Last refreshed

Methane emissions divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.