Belarus vs Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs): Natural gas — Energy use in agriculture

Belarus
5,206 TJ
in 2023
Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
6,398 TJ
in 2023
Belarus rank
14th
Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) rank
17th

Natural gas — Energy use in agriculture over time

  • Belarus
  • Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
05.0k10.0k15.0k199220072023

How they compare

Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) currently reports 6,398 TJ against 5,206 TJ in Belarus, a difference of 1,192 TJ.

That makes Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)'s figure about 1.2 times Belarus's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 29 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) ahead.

Belarus ranks 14th and Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) ranks 17th of 54 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Belarus averaged higher in 1 and Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Belarus Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) Difference Ahead
1990s 1,769 TJ 7,441 TJ 5,672 TJ Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
2000s 1,526 TJ 7,004 TJ 5,478 TJ Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
2010s 4,297 TJ 3,301 TJ 995.74 TJ Belarus
2020s 5,015 TJ 9,567 TJ 4,553 TJ Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher natural gas — energy use in agriculture, Belarus or Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)?
Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs), at 6,398 TJ against 5,206 TJ in Belarus as of 2023.
What is the difference in natural gas — energy use in agriculture between Belarus and Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)?
1,192 TJ, with Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)?
29 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2023.
How do Belarus and Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) rank globally for natural gas — energy use in agriculture?
Belarus ranks 14th and Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) ranks 17th of 54 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Natural gas — Energy use in agriculture. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Belarus vs Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs): Natural gas — Energy use in agriculture. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 13 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/natural-gas-energy-use-in-agriculture/belarus/low-income-food-deficit-countries-lifdcs/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/natural-gas-energy-use-in-agriculture/belarus/low-income-food-deficit-countries-lifdcs/">Belarus vs Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs): Natural gas — Energy use in agriculture</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Natural gas — Energy use in agriculture
Unit
TJ
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
82 places, 2,339 data points, 1990–2023
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Energy use in agriculture contains data on energy used in agriculture (including forestry, aquaculture and fisheries), for instance to operate machinery, irrigate, heat stables, operate aquaculture ponds and fishing vessels, and related greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. It also includes on-farm use of, and related GHG emissions from, electricity and heat generated off-farm. Data are available by country and regional groups with global coverage and are updated annually.