Angola vs Italy: Net Forest conversion — Area, annual growth rate
Angola
0 % change on previous year
in 2025
Italy
0 % change on previous year
in 2025
Angola rank
1st
Italy rank
1st
Net Forest conversion — Area, annual growth rate over time
- Angola
- Italy
How they compare
Angola currently reports 0 % change on previous year against 0 % change on previous year in Italy, a difference of 0 % change on previous year.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 9 shared years of data; in 2012 it was Italy ahead.
Angola ranks 1st and Italy ranks 1st of 161 countries.
Angola has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Angola | Italy | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0.0001 % change on previous year | -20 % change on previous year | 20 % change on previous year | Angola |
| 2020s | 0 % change on previous year | 0 % change on previous year | 0 % change on previous year | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net forest conversion — area, annual growth rate, Angola or Italy?
- Angola, at 0 % change on previous year against 0 % change on previous year in Italy as of 2025.
- What is the difference in net forest conversion — area, annual growth rate between Angola and Italy?
- 0 % change on previous year, with Angola ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Angola and Italy?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2025.
- How do Angola and Italy rank globally for net forest conversion — area, annual growth rate?
- Angola ranks 1st and Italy ranks 1st of 161 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Net Forest conversion — Area, annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The year-on-year percentage change in Net Forest conversion — Area. Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.