Asia vs Israel: Net Forest conversion — Area, annual growth rate
Asia
0 % change on previous year
in 2025
Israel
0 % change on previous year
in 2025
Asia rank
1st
Israel rank
1st
Net Forest conversion — Area, annual growth rate over time
- Asia
- Israel
How they compare
Asia currently reports 0 % change on previous year against 0 % change on previous year in Israel, a difference of 0 % change on previous year.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 20 shared years of data; in 1991 it was Israel ahead.
Asia ranks 1st and Israel ranks 1st of 32 groups.
Asia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Asia | Israel | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.0066 % change on previous year | 0 % change on previous year | 0.0066 % change on previous year | Asia |
| 2000s | -39.72 % change on previous year | -50 % change on previous year | 10.28 % change on previous year | Asia |
| 2010s | 0 % change on previous year | 0 % change on previous year | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 2020s | 2.86 % change on previous year | -13.33 % change on previous year | 16.2 % change on previous year | Asia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net forest conversion — area, annual growth rate, Asia or Israel?
- Asia, at 0 % change on previous year against 0 % change on previous year in Israel as of 2025.
- What is the difference in net forest conversion — area, annual growth rate between Asia and Israel?
- 0 % change on previous year, with Asia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Asia and Israel?
- 20 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2025.
- How do Asia and Israel rank globally for net forest conversion — area, annual growth rate?
- Asia ranks 1st and Israel ranks 1st of 32 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Net Forest conversion — Area, annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The year-on-year percentage change in Net Forest conversion — Area. Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.