Chile vs Iraq: Net Forest conversion — Area, annual growth rate
Chile
0 % change on previous year
in 2025
Iraq
0 % change on previous year
in 2025
Chile rank
1st
Iraq rank
1st
Net Forest conversion — Area, annual growth rate over time
- Chile
- Iraq
How they compare
Chile currently reports 0 % change on previous year against 0 % change on previous year in Iraq, a difference of 0 % change on previous year.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 24 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Iraq ahead.
Chile ranks 1st and Iraq ranks 1st of 161 countries.
Iraq has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chile | Iraq | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0 % change on previous year | 0 % change on previous year | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 2010s | 1.68 % change on previous year | 59.25 % change on previous year | 57.57 % change on previous year | Iraq |
| 2020s | -8.46 % change on previous year | 1.11 % change on previous year | 9.57 % change on previous year | Iraq |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net forest conversion — area, annual growth rate, Chile or Iraq?
- Chile, at 0 % change on previous year against 0 % change on previous year in Iraq as of 2025.
- What is the difference in net forest conversion — area, annual growth rate between Chile and Iraq?
- 0 % change on previous year, with Chile ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Iraq?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2025.
- How do Chile and Iraq rank globally for net forest conversion — area, annual growth rate?
- Chile ranks 1st and Iraq ranks 1st of 161 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Net Forest conversion — Area, annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The year-on-year percentage change in Net Forest conversion — Area. Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.