Chile vs Togo: Net Forest conversion — Area, annual growth rate
Chile
0 % change on previous year
in 2025
Togo
0 % change on previous year
in 2025
Chile rank
1st
Togo rank
1st
Net Forest conversion — Area, annual growth rate over time
- Chile
- Togo
How they compare
Chile currently reports 0 % change on previous year against 0 % change on previous year in Togo, a difference of 0 % change on previous year.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 35 shared years of data; in 1991 it was Togo ahead.
Chile ranks 1st and Togo ranks 1st of 161 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Chile averaged higher in 2 and Togo in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chile | Togo | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 % change on previous year | 0 % change on previous year | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 2000s | 0 % change on previous year | -0.0023 % change on previous year | 0.0023 % change on previous year | Chile |
| 2010s | 1.68 % change on previous year | 0 % change on previous year | 1.68 % change on previous year | Chile |
| 2020s | -8.46 % change on previous year | -1.24 % change on previous year | 7.21 % change on previous year | Togo |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net forest conversion — area, annual growth rate, Chile or Togo?
- Chile, at 0 % change on previous year against 0 % change on previous year in Togo as of 2025.
- What is the difference in net forest conversion — area, annual growth rate between Chile and Togo?
- 0 % change on previous year, with Chile ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Togo?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2025.
- How do Chile and Togo rank globally for net forest conversion — area, annual growth rate?
- Chile ranks 1st and Togo ranks 1st of 161 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Net Forest conversion — Area, annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The year-on-year percentage change in Net Forest conversion — Area. Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.