Pakistan vs Rwanda: Net Forest conversion — Area, annual growth rate
Pakistan
-100 % change on previous year
in 2016
Rwanda
-100 % change on previous year
in 2011
Pakistan rank
106th
Rwanda rank
106th
Net Forest conversion — Area, annual growth rate over time
- Pakistan
- Rwanda
How they compare
Pakistan currently reports -100 % change on previous year against -100 % change on previous year in Rwanda, a difference of 0 % change on previous year.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 21 shared years of data; in 1991 it was Rwanda ahead.
Pakistan ranks 106th and Rwanda ranks 106th of 161 countries.
Pakistan has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Pakistan | Rwanda | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 % change on previous year | 0 % change on previous year | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 2000s | 0.5443 % change on previous year | -5.01 % change on previous year | 5.55 % change on previous year | Pakistan |
| 2010s | 34.44 % change on previous year | -50 % change on previous year | 84.44 % change on previous year | Pakistan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net forest conversion — area, annual growth rate, Pakistan or Rwanda?
- Pakistan, at -100 % change on previous year against -100 % change on previous year in Rwanda as of 2016.
- What is the difference in net forest conversion — area, annual growth rate between Pakistan and Rwanda?
- 0 % change on previous year, with Pakistan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Pakistan and Rwanda?
- 21 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2011.
- How do Pakistan and Rwanda rank globally for net forest conversion — area, annual growth rate?
- Pakistan ranks 106th and Rwanda ranks 106th of 161 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Net Forest conversion — Area, annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The year-on-year percentage change in Net Forest conversion — Area. Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.