Philippines vs Rwanda: Net Forest conversion — Area, annual growth rate
Philippines
-100 % change on previous year
in 2011
Rwanda
-100 % change on previous year
in 2011
Philippines rank
106th
Rwanda rank
106th
Net Forest conversion — Area, annual growth rate over time
- Philippines
- Rwanda
How they compare
Philippines currently reports -100 % change on previous year against -100 % change on previous year in Rwanda, a difference of 0 % change on previous year.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 21 shared years of data; in 1991 it was Rwanda ahead.
Philippines ranks 106th and Rwanda ranks 106th of 161 countries.
Philippines has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Philippines | Rwanda | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 % change on previous year | 0 % change on previous year | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 2000s | 0.0002 % change on previous year | -5.01 % change on previous year | 5.01 % change on previous year | Philippines |
| 2010s | -50 % change on previous year | -50 % change on previous year | 0 % change on previous year | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net forest conversion — area, annual growth rate, Philippines or Rwanda?
- Philippines, at -100 % change on previous year against -100 % change on previous year in Rwanda as of 2011.
- What is the difference in net forest conversion — area, annual growth rate between Philippines and Rwanda?
- 0 % change on previous year, with Philippines ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Philippines and Rwanda?
- 21 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2011.
- How do Philippines and Rwanda rank globally for net forest conversion — area, annual growth rate?
- Philippines ranks 106th and Rwanda ranks 106th of 161 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Net Forest conversion — Area, annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The year-on-year percentage change in Net Forest conversion — Area. Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.