Afghanistan vs Kiribati: Net Forest conversion — Area
Afghanistan
0 1000 ha
in 2025
Kiribati
0 1000 ha
in 2025
Afghanistan rank
96th
Kiribati rank
96th
Net Forest conversion — Area over time
- Afghanistan
- Kiribati
How they compare
Afghanistan currently reports 0 1000 ha against 0 1000 ha in Kiribati, a difference of 0 1000 ha.
Across all 36 years both countries report, Kiribati has been ahead every year.
Afghanistan ranks 96th and Kiribati ranks 96th of 217 countries.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Afghanistan | Kiribati | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 1000 ha | 0 1000 ha | 0 1000 ha | — |
| 2000s | 0 1000 ha | 0 1000 ha | 0 1000 ha | — |
| 2010s | 0 1000 ha | 0 1000 ha | 0 1000 ha | — |
| 2020s | 0 1000 ha | 0 1000 ha | 0 1000 ha | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net forest conversion — area, Afghanistan or Kiribati?
- Afghanistan, at 0 1000 ha against 0 1000 ha in Kiribati as of 2025.
- What is the difference in net forest conversion — area between Afghanistan and Kiribati?
- 0 1000 ha, with Afghanistan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Afghanistan and Kiribati?
- 36 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2025.
- How do Afghanistan and Kiribati rank globally for net forest conversion — area?
- Afghanistan ranks 96th and Kiribati ranks 96th of 217 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Net Forest conversion — Area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Forests consists of CO2 emissions and removals corresponding to forest carbon stock changes (aboveground and belowground living biomass). Estimates are computed following the 2006 IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories (IPCC, 2006).