Aruba vs Belgium: Net Forest conversion — Area — FAO TIER 1
Aruba
0 1000 ha
in 2025
Belgium
0 1000 ha
in 2025
Aruba rank
111th
Belgium rank
111th
Net Forest conversion — Area — FAO TIER 1 over time
- Aruba
- Belgium
How they compare
Aruba currently reports 0 1000 ha against 0 1000 ha in Belgium, a difference of 0 1000 ha.
Across all 26 years both countries report, Belgium has been ahead every year.
Aruba ranks 111th and Belgium ranks 111th of 239 countries.
Belgium has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Aruba | Belgium | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0 1000 ha | 0.5217 1000 ha | 0.5217 1000 ha | Belgium |
| 2010s | 0 1000 ha | 4.75 1000 ha | 4.75 1000 ha | Belgium |
| 2020s | 0 1000 ha | 0.6293 1000 ha | 0.6293 1000 ha | Belgium |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net forest conversion — area — fao tier 1, Aruba or Belgium?
- Aruba, at 0 1000 ha against 0 1000 ha in Belgium as of 2025.
- What is the difference in net forest conversion — area — fao tier 1 between Aruba and Belgium?
- 0 1000 ha, with Aruba ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Aruba and Belgium?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2025.
- How do Aruba and Belgium rank globally for net forest conversion — area — fao tier 1?
- Aruba ranks 111th and Belgium ranks 111th of 239 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Net Forest conversion — Area — FAO TIER 1. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Forests consists of CO2 emissions and removals corresponding to forest carbon stock changes (aboveground and belowground living biomass). Estimates are computed following the 2006 IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories (IPCC, 2006).