Aruba vs Turkmenistan: Net Forest conversion — Area
Aruba
0 1000 ha
in 2025
Turkmenistan
0 1000 ha
in 2025
Aruba rank
96th
Turkmenistan rank
96th
Net Forest conversion — Area over time
- Aruba
- Turkmenistan
How they compare
Aruba currently reports 0 1000 ha against 0 1000 ha in Turkmenistan, a difference of 0 1000 ha.
Across all 34 years both countries report, Turkmenistan has been ahead every year.
Aruba ranks 96th and Turkmenistan ranks 96th of 217 countries.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Aruba | Turkmenistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 1000 ha | 0 1000 ha | 0 1000 ha | — |
| 2000s | 0 1000 ha | 0 1000 ha | 0 1000 ha | — |
| 2010s | 0 1000 ha | 0 1000 ha | 0 1000 ha | — |
| 2020s | 0 1000 ha | 0 1000 ha | 0 1000 ha | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net forest conversion — area, Aruba or Turkmenistan?
- Aruba, at 0 1000 ha against 0 1000 ha in Turkmenistan as of 2025.
- What is the difference in net forest conversion — area between Aruba and Turkmenistan?
- 0 1000 ha, with Aruba ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Aruba and Turkmenistan?
- 34 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2025.
- How do Aruba and Turkmenistan rank globally for net forest conversion — area?
- Aruba ranks 96th and Turkmenistan ranks 96th of 217 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Net Forest conversion — Area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Forests consists of CO2 emissions and removals corresponding to forest carbon stock changes (aboveground and belowground living biomass). Estimates are computed following the 2006 IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories (IPCC, 2006).