Australia and New Zealand vs Eritrea: Net Forest conversion — Area

Australia and New Zealand
5.95 1000 ha
in 2025
Eritrea
5.98 1000 ha
in 2025
Australia and New Zealand rank
55th
Eritrea rank
54th

Net Forest conversion — Area over time

  • Australia and New Zealand
  • Eritrea
0100200300199020072025

How they compare

Eritrea currently reports 5.98 1000 ha against 5.95 1000 ha in Australia and New Zealand, a difference of 0.03 1000 ha.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 33 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Australia and New Zealand ahead.

Australia and New Zealand ranks 55th and Eritrea ranks 54th of 223 countries.

Australia and New Zealand has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia and New Zealand Eritrea Difference Ahead
1990s 214.5 1000 ha 5.98 1000 ha 208.52 1000 ha Australia and New Zealand
2000s 252.69 1000 ha 5.98 1000 ha 246.71 1000 ha Australia and New Zealand
2010s 44.86 1000 ha 5.98 1000 ha 38.88 1000 ha Australia and New Zealand
2020s 11.51 1000 ha 5.98 1000 ha 5.53 1000 ha Australia and New Zealand

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net forest conversion — area, Australia and New Zealand or Eritrea?
Eritrea, at 5.98 1000 ha against 5.95 1000 ha in Australia and New Zealand as of 2025.
What is the difference in net forest conversion — area between Australia and New Zealand and Eritrea?
0.03 1000 ha, with Eritrea ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and New Zealand and Eritrea?
33 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2025.
How do Australia and New Zealand and Eritrea rank globally for net forest conversion — area?
Australia and New Zealand ranks 55th and Eritrea ranks 54th of 223 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Net Forest conversion — Area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia and New Zealand vs Eritrea: Net Forest conversion — Area. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 27 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/net-forest-conversion-area-fao-tier-1/australia-and-new-zealand/eritrea/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/net-forest-conversion-area-fao-tier-1/australia-and-new-zealand/eritrea/">Australia and New Zealand vs Eritrea: Net Forest conversion — Area</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net Forest conversion — Area
Unit
1000 ha
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
275 places, 9,600 data points, 1990–2025
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Forests consists of CO2 emissions and removals corresponding to forest carbon stock changes (aboveground and belowground living biomass). Estimates are computed following the 2006 IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories (IPCC, 2006).