Belarus vs Belgium: Net Forest conversion — Area — FAO TIER 1

Belarus
0 1000 ha
in 2025
Belgium
0 1000 ha
in 2025
Belarus rank
111th
Belgium rank
111th

Net Forest conversion — Area — FAO TIER 1 over time

  • Belarus
  • Belgium
051015199220082025

How they compare

Belarus currently reports 0 1000 ha against 0 1000 ha in Belgium, a difference of 0 1000 ha.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 26 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Belarus ahead.

Belarus ranks 111th and Belgium ranks 111th of 239 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Belarus averaged higher in 2 and Belgium in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Belarus Belgium Difference Ahead
2000s 1.63 1000 ha 0.5217 1000 ha 1.11 1000 ha Belarus
2010s 6.21 1000 ha 4.75 1000 ha 1.47 1000 ha Belarus
2020s 0 1000 ha 0.6293 1000 ha 0.6293 1000 ha Belgium

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net forest conversion — area — fao tier 1, Belarus or Belgium?
Belarus, at 0 1000 ha against 0 1000 ha in Belgium as of 2025.
What is the difference in net forest conversion — area — fao tier 1 between Belarus and Belgium?
0 1000 ha, with Belarus ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Belgium?
26 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2025.
How do Belarus and Belgium rank globally for net forest conversion — area — fao tier 1?
Belarus ranks 111th and Belgium ranks 111th of 239 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Net Forest conversion — Area — FAO TIER 1. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Net Forest conversion — Area — FAO TIER 1
Unit
1000 ha
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
275 places, 9,600 data points, 1990–2025
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Forests consists of CO2 emissions and removals corresponding to forest carbon stock changes (aboveground and belowground living biomass). Estimates are computed following the 2006 IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories (IPCC, 2006).